Political International Researches
Year:2016 | Volume:8 | Issue:28|Papers Count:8

The article aims to analyze the Syria crisis management pattern by the great powers within the uni-multipolar system while using the structural realism assumptions. According to the structural realism logic, the change of structure in the international system will lead to the distortion of processes in the international arena, all of which in turn will be an impetus for the great powers to modify their comportment regarding the crisis management. The article elaborates the effects which a uni-multipolar system will have on the great powers’ comportment within the system and how it will affect certain styles of International Syria crisis management envisaged by them? This paper Believes that the constraints enforced by the international system is able to radically change the comportment of the agents, therefore a uni-multipolar system will provide sufficient impetus for creating an “Asymmetrical Balance of Power” in the international arena and especially Syria crisis. The asymmetrical balance of power as a pattern of behavior is endowed with certain characteristics as it allows the formation of coalitions in response to the aggression and sanctions. The paper uses the explanatory-descriptive method and the level of analysis which has been envisaged is the third image or the international level.

The present paper is to explore the reasons behind the security crisis in Yemen since 2011 by applying the theories of security. Yemen which had been undergoing civil war since the unification, was overhelmed by violence, civil war and regional interference since the Arab spring. The main question of present paper is as follows: how the security challenges of Yemen since the arab spring can be explained? the methodology of research is analytical descriptive approach. The findings of the paper illustrate that in yemen a complicated combination of internal and external threats exists which affect each other and third world security studies especially the approach of Litel have explanatory capability for explaining these crises. Moreover, it seems that the military intervention of Saudi Arabia wil exacerbate the security crisis in Yemen and internal challenges along with the interventions of regional powers will complicate and exacerbate the situation in this country.

Geopolitics sphere of Iraq has convergent and divergent forces within himself which was to act under certain circumstances and are in competition with each other permanently. Iraq has been faced with evolution that led to a change in the power structure and its identity that it causes change in the geopolitical and regional approaches and actors have been cast. Ethnic and religious groups, hydropolitics, Arabic identity and national identity, due to the massive oil resources and revenues and manner of accessibility to the Persian Gulf in preparation and process developments in Iraq The geopolitical strategies depending on the situation in Iraq and the type and composition of the Iraqi government. Impact on Iran's national security and has become the enemy of the Islamic Republic of Iran is a strategic competitor or strategic partner. The research was conducted following analytical method to study political geography, interior, historical and geopolitical Iraq, A set space requirements, security and political deals.

There has been much criticism of Obama's Middle Eastern strategy and some believe that it lacked the strategic landscape. The United States' Middle Eastern strategy review under President Obama from the approach of neoclassical realism not only does not approve this view, but also it proves that Obama has adopted a coherent strategy from the beginning of presidency towards the Middle East and on this basis he has made considerable efforts to promote America's national security. So, the answer to this question is important that which strategy used by Obama towards the Middle East and how has followed this trend? This study utilizes the method of descriptive- analytical, shows that United States Middle Eastern policy under Obama started with the assignment of responsibility to its regional allies in the form of offshore balancing and with time moved to accept limited responsibility. Due to the proximity of the Obama administration's foreign policy doctrine to realism, from the viewpoint of the authors, this theory can explain better the foreign policy of the United States under President Barack Obama.

The Syria possesses geopolitical, geostrategic, and geo-economic importance and for this reason it is deemed as the cross point for opposite forces with the maximum crisis and tension. Also regional and trans regional superpowers pay special attention to this country. The strategic situation of Syria is crucially important for Iran in terms of prestige in resistance movement, national security issues, and competition with Saudi Arabia, and expansion of influence in the Middle East. The present research has studied Iranian diplomatic approach in Syria by means of descriptive and analytical method within framework of Game Theory. The question paper is that What is the significance of Syria for the Iran? What is the policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Syria after Bashar al-Assad, to be able to maintain its position in the region? It is believed that Iran intends to exit from the existing geopolitical constraints and to expand influence in the Middle East and continuity of its strategic depth using strategic opportunities in Syria and in any case it would not like to lose such a position in Syria.

Although all members in the OICs belong to a unit religious bloc, but, the type and level of women's struggles and the organizational structure of relationships in each of these countries are different significantly. In this paper, using Text analysis and inserve questionnaire to analyze the manifests and speeches of active women has applied. four NGOs included: “KA-mer” in Turkey, ”Women and Arab Society Association” in Egypt, “International Islamic committee for women and child” in Saudi Arabia and All-Women's Action Society of Malaysia has been studied. They are the most important samples of countries that stroggle for the recognition of women's identity. The main question in this paper is that why the women's demands in Islamic countries has designed deferente. This problem has studied according to the theories of postcolonial feminism (Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak) and the third generation of the Frankfurt School (Axcel Honnth). The results of Regrassion test showed 43% of variation in performance women's organizations are explained under the influence of the political structure. The results of this test reveald that the opration of women's organization in Turkey and Malaysia are much more similar, there are similarity between Egypt and Saudi Arabia.

Due to the position of Turkey in the Middle East and their impact on regional developments in the Middle East, This country since the rise of the AKP is trying to position more important than to paint for yourself. Turkey with regard to the heirs of the last Islamic empire, attempted to revive the Islamic world during its preservation. In this regard, the Turkish model in recent years with political and economic dimensions to the Islamic world and especially in the Middle East. Democracy, economic development, political stability and a political leadership role in regional conflicts, including indices of Turkey which Despite some success in the early stages, followed by the failure of successive faced. Turkey has its internal problems to grapple with issues in the areas of regional and international political and economic causes is sent to the Turkish model is not the same charm and is in practice fail.