Political International Researches
Year:2017 | Volume:9 | Issue:32 |Papers Count:7

Interactions and relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia, as two regional powers, on developments in the region and the countries involved. can be used to predict future events in the foreign policy of engagement with countries, policy-making timely and correct and appropriate decisions were made. The purpose of this paper is a combination of scripting methods and James Dytvr second step in the process of analyzing the impact of events and scenarios for the future of relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia planning and appropriate policies, explain and analyze. the main question is what is the scenario the next decade relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia? According to Events and propellant booster and hinder relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia, these findings have made the scenario of relations, most of the likely scenario of cooperation, with the possibility that the scenario of war or interruption of the likely to strengthen one of the drivers to join cleaned. it is necessary to politicians in their strategic planning, given that the desired pattern of foreign policy, cooperation and constructive engagement, strengthening the ideological and cultural propulsion as well as internal forces in the region to strengthen cooperation scenario to proceed.

The examination of the national power requires to evaluate and to calculate the different economical, social, political, territorial, culture and …components and factors of the countries. The knowledge and the measurement of the national power of the countries with the purpose of determining their geopolitical weight and rank has always been considered by the political science researchers and scientists. present objective of the study, analysis and evaluation of national power five peripheral countries in Iran, including the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Qatar, Oman and Bahrain in power dimensions of hard power and soft power).in the midst of the main question that power structure in five countries peripheral Iran? research hypothesis, stated that: the national power component, selected countries in the West Asian region, respectively, in the three-level of the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Qatar, Oman and Bahrain The document, as a result of a research project in terms of the level of analysis of descriptive-analytical nature. the results showed that the structure of power between the five countries, three of them in the level of power in the first level of power, the State of the Emirates and Qatar, in the second level, Kuwait, oman, and Bahrain in the third level.

Nowadays, Energy security, as one of the dimensions of national security, is one of the main concerns of all states. Because of having big resources of natural gas and favorable geopolitical location, Iran has high potential in international gas trade via pipelines. The main goal of this article is a clarification of challenges which Iran faces them in the national security realization by pipelines. The main question is what are the challenges and its solutions of Iran in gas trade by poplins. On the base of descriptive-analytic study of subject, Iran faces challenges in supply security, as importing county, demand security, as exporting country, and transit security, as transit country; but the main challenge is in demand dimension. To keep existent demand and making diversity in demand, desirable solutions are increasing investment, Technical Knowledge Transfer, and promotion of demand readiness in emergency situations and declining of international disputes in gas supply.

Waterways and rivers forming the borders of many countries in the world, and unlike land borders, River water borders and boundaries, particularly because of their specific strengths and weaknesses are creating more tension and crisis areas. Two major rivers Amu Darya and garlic in Central Asia along with its subsidiaries, is the The issues and challenges involved in the five countries of the region is made. In fact, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, as well as some other areas, the regional heritage incoherent and incorrect management of shared water resources by the Soviet Union. This cross-sectional study using the Amudarya and Syrdarya rivers in the area between hydropolitic countries deals The most important issues and escalate disputes and causes of trans-boundary rivers in the region studied and analyzed the. Research findings show that the different interests of upstream and downstream countries, mismanagement, extensive dam-building, climate change, the involvement of regional and trans-regional powers, population growth, urbanization and agricultural monoculture of the main causes of border disputes over water resources are shared.

Relations between China and the United States is perhaps the most complex and the most contradictions in the relations between the great powers, he said. Relationships that are influenced by multiple factors and many cases the opposite is always fluctuating and at times unpredictable. china as representative of emerging powers and America as representative symbols of the traditional powers of the twenty-first century's global rival and conflicting policies world can understand eyes are International . So on the basis of this article, using a model analysis model structural realist Kenneth Waltz adjustments also bring up the question of the security strategies of China against America movements in different regions will? With classified security strategies in China Four behavioral model balance of hard and soft balance, following hard on the soft trail, but each of them also a function of the combination of three factors: relative power, relative security and relative ideology have tried to explain this issue.

The concept of global governance has become ever more popular and confusion about its meaning ever greater. While we do think that some flexibility in the use of concepts is both theoretically desirable and practically unavoidable, we believe that the current disarray is a hindrance to more fruitful discussions and to the goal of developing more coherent theories of global governance. a more careful use of the term global governance is necessary to get the goal of theorizing it. Therefore, the question is “whether we can treat global governance as a theory (let alone a dominant theory)?”. This article does not seek to clarify the concept but to reveal ambiguities around it. Thus, the discussion is divided into three parts: concept of global governance (definitions); contending perspectives on global governance; and empirical problems (global governance as a “situation”).ambiguities around it. Thus, the discussion is divided into three parts: concept of global governance (definitions); contending perspectives on global governance; and empirical problems (global governance as a “situation”).