This study was
carried out on six-year-old date palms (c.v Piarom) in Hormozgan Province, Iran,
during 1994-2001. In this study, two volumes of water and two irrigation systems
were compared in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) in a factorial
arrangement in three replications. Each replication consisted of four date palm
trees with following four treatments: A1= drip and A2= surface irrigation
method, B1= water use based on 75%, and B2= 100% evaporation from class A pan.
Water use was calculated based on ETP class A pan method by following formulas:
ETo= Ep ×Kp, ETc= ETo
× Kc, I=ETc ×
S / ŋ, in which ETo = Reference
evapotranspiration, Ep = Pan evaporation, Kp = Pan coefficient, Kc = crop
coefficient, I = Irrigation requirement, S = surface, ETc = Crop
evapotranspiration, and Ŋ= efficiency of irrigation system. Irrigation interval
in drip irrigation was two days and for surface irrigation it was weekly. The
results showed that there were no significant effects of treatments on the
yield, and quality of fruit, such as pH, TSS, total sugar, reduced sugar,
sucrose, moisture percentage, and dry matter percentage. The results of the
study showed that water requirement in treatments of drip irrigation based on
75% evaporation of class A pan (Ep), drip irrigation based on 100% Ep, surface
irrigation based on 75% Ep, and surface irrigation based on 100% Ep were equal
to 23.7, 42.65, 57.46, 100.45 m3/tree/year, respectively. Also the
results showed no significant effects of treatments on the yield and quality of
fruit, except for titratable acidity that was significant (P<0.01). Therefore,
due to many advantages such as more efficient use of water, low cost, easy to
schedule and manage, and easy to automate, drip irrigation is recommended as the
best irrigation method for date palm plantation in southern Iran.