Urban spaces in the past were the places where people used to meet, gather and communicate according to their traditions (celebrations, feasts, religious ceremonies, etc.). The urban environment was the place for satisfying social demands, while the family satisfied the natural requirements. In other words, the urban environment was the cultural and the family was the natural territory of man.
Contemporary urban open spaces are mainly designed for cars, however. They are not only incapable of meeting the social demands, but also ignore cultural traditions and interrupt social relationships. Thus the outward appearance of urban open spaces have the major role for transportation and the role of people who are supposed to use urban open space as socio- cultural environments has been thoroughly ignored. Furthermore the buildings exterior which plays the key role in the legibility of the urban space is often designed with no relation to this space.
To solve the problems caused by this approach, planners try to create open urban spaces with different functions. They try to create legible spaces through design of building exteriors on the basis of cognition, association, and recognition processes.
Inspired by traditional fabrics which correspond to cultural requirements, they therefore recommend design of building exteriors in accordance with current living conditions. Thus cultural factors particular to a certain society will make a combination of open and closed spaces which will inevitably correspond to the physical, environmental and psychological requirements of that society. Instead of inappropriate copying of forms, this approach combines the physical attributes of spaces with the cultural needs of society, which will lead to a unique character, a particular identity, and a uniform coherent whole that conforms to its natural environment.