مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

63
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Study of the Narrations and Opinions of the Rijā, lī,Scholars about Abdullah ibn Khidā, sh,evaluating his position among the narrators accused of exaggeration in the Najā, shī, ’, s Rijā, l

Pages

  219-250

Abstract

Abdullah Ibn Khidā, sh Al-Mahrī,(Al-Basrī, ) was one of the compiler narrators whose narrations have been reflected in Al-Kā, fī, , Tahzī, b Al-Ahkā, m and other hadith collections. He was accused of Exaggeration by Najā, shī, , while was authenticated by Sheikh Kashī, . In addition, he was among hadith masters of Safwā, n Ibn Yahyā, , being consequently subject to Common Authenticity. Evaluating Ibn Khidā, sh’, s position among the narrators accused of Exaggeration in Najā, shī, ’, s Rijā, l, this study carefully examined the Rijā, lī,scholars’,statements about him and analyzed the sanads and texts of his narrations. It concluded that Ibn Khidā, sh belongs to those narrators directly accused of Exaggeration by Najā, shī, . In contrast, in terms of Ibn Khidā, sh’, s narrations, there is no sentence of Exaggeration. So it may conclude that his narrations, if we accept his Exaggeration, were not been well selected and refined. In addition, considering the existence of jurisprudential narrations from him, which is against allowance (ibā, hi), as well as some of his doctrinal narrations that are in opposition to the beliefs of exaggerators, it may cast doubt on his accusation of Exaggeration. Finally, his narrations also have confirmations, i. e. the presence of Ibn Khidā, sh in the sanad of these narrations does not cause rejecting such narrations.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    NAFISI, SHADI, & REZAEE, HOSSEIN. (2022). A Study of the Narrations and Opinions of the Rijā, lī,Scholars about Abdullah ibn Khidā, sh,evaluating his position among the narrators accused of exaggeration in the Najā, shī, ’, s Rijā, l. TAHQIQAT-E ULUM-E QURAN WA HADITH, 19(1 (53) ), 219-250. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/1036567/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    NAFISI SHADI, REZAEE HOSSEIN. A Study of the Narrations and Opinions of the Rijā, lī,Scholars about Abdullah ibn Khidā, sh,evaluating his position among the narrators accused of exaggeration in the Najā, shī, ’, s Rijā, l. TAHQIQAT-E ULUM-E QURAN WA HADITH[Internet]. 2022;19(1 (53) ):219-250. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/1036567/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SHADI NAFISI, and HOSSEIN REZAEE, “A Study of the Narrations and Opinions of the Rijā, lī,Scholars about Abdullah ibn Khidā, sh,evaluating his position among the narrators accused of exaggeration in the Najā, shī, ’, s Rijā, l,” TAHQIQAT-E ULUM-E QURAN WA HADITH, vol. 19, no. 1 (53) , pp. 219–250, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/1036567/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button