مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

811
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EXAMINATION OF MAJOR POWERS’ COERCIVE STRATEGIES IN ASYMMETRIC CONFLICTS THROUGH APPLICATION OF HAUN’S THEORY

Pages

  919-934

Abstract

 In ASYMMETRIC CONFLICTs, GREAT POWERS often adopt coercive strategies toward weak states. This strategy is a combination of threat, and limited and warning use of force if necessary to impact the opposite's strategy choice. Given that the threats of the most powerful states are more effective because the penalty for target disobedience will be more intensive, it seems that the weak states must easily submit to GREAT POWERS coercive DETERRENCE and COMPELLENCE demands to keep away from punishments. But why many evidence and experimental studies show the failure of this strategy in result of the resistance of weak states which finally leads GREAT POWERS to take up costly brute force strategy? This is a question that Phil Haun answers with this hypothesis that the greater the coercive requests of the GREAT POWERS threatens the survival of a weak state the more probable the failure of the COERCIVE STRATEGY will be. In this article, we modify HAUN'S THEORY based on weak state's costs and benefits calculations and its resistance preferences in order to extend the theory to cases which are not explicable in terms of Haun's hypothesis, and we inspect one of the cases- North Korean nuclear crisis- which has been shown to be incongruent with what occurred in real world by Haun's hypothesis and account for North Korean resistance strategy toward the United States' coercive demands.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SHIRKHANI, MOHAMMADALI, & TAHERKHANI, SETAREH. (2017). EXAMINATION OF MAJOR POWERS’ COERCIVE STRATEGIES IN ASYMMETRIC CONFLICTS THROUGH APPLICATION OF HAUN’S THEORY. POLITICS QUARTERLY: JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LAW AND POLITICAL SCIENCE, 46(4 ), 919-934. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/110002/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SHIRKHANI MOHAMMADALI, TAHERKHANI SETAREH. EXAMINATION OF MAJOR POWERS’ COERCIVE STRATEGIES IN ASYMMETRIC CONFLICTS THROUGH APPLICATION OF HAUN’S THEORY. POLITICS QUARTERLY: JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LAW AND POLITICAL SCIENCE[Internet]. 2017;46(4 ):919-934. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/110002/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MOHAMMADALI SHIRKHANI, and SETAREH TAHERKHANI, “EXAMINATION OF MAJOR POWERS’ COERCIVE STRATEGIES IN ASYMMETRIC CONFLICTS THROUGH APPLICATION OF HAUN’S THEORY,” POLITICS QUARTERLY: JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LAW AND POLITICAL SCIENCE, vol. 46, no. 4 , pp. 919–934, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/110002/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button