A COMPARISON OF THE PRINCIPLES OF LEGITIMACY IN ACHAEMENID AND SASSANID'S STATES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

NAGHIBZADEH AHMAD; IZADI AMIR MOHAMMAD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Political Quarterly Year:2016 | Volume:46 | Issue:3 Page(s): 797-815

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

863

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON OF THE PRINCIPLES OF LEGITIMACY IN ACHAEMENID AND SASSANID'S STATES

Author(s)

NAGHIBZADEH AHMAD | IZADI AMIR MOHAMMAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ACHAEMENIQ2

CHARISMQ2

LEGITIMACYQ2

SASSANIDQ2

TRADITIONQ2

Abstract

Since the beginning of human history, one of the basic dilemmas that every political institution must solve is how to exercise legitimate authority- that is, how to govern with the consent. "You can’t sit on bayonets," goes an old political expression. This is a way of saying that although a state can exercise its power through the use of police force or coercion, in the long run the use of force will not be sufficient to govern a society. For political sociologists since Weber’s time, the answer to this question begins with the concept of LEGITIMACY. According to discussions considered in this paper, and Historical review of two systems- ACHAEMENId and SASSANID- we can conclude that thought in Iranian social from ACHAEMENId to SASSANID was evolving and according to weber's idea, although LEGAL AUTHORITY is for modern society, the thought that political authority comes ‘from below’ and the concept of social contract existed in ancient iran.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

NAGHIBZADEH, AHMAD, & IZADI, AMIR MOHAMMAD. (2016). A COMPARISON OF THE PRINCIPLES OF LEGITIMACY IN ACHAEMENID AND SASSANID'S STATES. POLITICS QUARTERLY: JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LAW AND POLITICAL SCIENCE, 46(3 ), 797-815. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/110242/en

Vancouver: Copy

NAGHIBZADEH AHMAD, IZADI AMIR MOHAMMAD. A COMPARISON OF THE PRINCIPLES OF LEGITIMACY IN ACHAEMENID AND SASSANID'S STATES. POLITICS QUARTERLY: JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LAW AND POLITICAL SCIENCE[Internet]. 2016;46(3 ):797-815. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/110242/en

IEEE: Copy

AHMAD NAGHIBZADEH, and AMIR MOHAMMAD IZADI, “A COMPARISON OF THE PRINCIPLES OF LEGITIMACY IN ACHAEMENID AND SASSANID'S STATES,” POLITICS QUARTERLY: JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LAW AND POLITICAL SCIENCE, vol. 46, no. 3 , pp. 797–815, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/110242/en

Related Journal Papers