مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

717
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

176
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

U.S OFFENSIVE POLICY TOWARD IRAN’S SECURITY IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND PERSIAN GULF AFTER 33 DAY’S WAR

Pages

  115-134

Abstract

 U.S foreign policy interests in the Middle East and Persian Gulf region has always had three components: economy, SECURITY and politics. It is not overstated to stress the centrality of energy resources in the economic sector as a predominant factor. In this context, securing access to energy and the flow of oil become vital for world economic prosperity. The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, added more impetus to the U.S SECURITY issues in the Persian Gulf. President Bush’s doctrine of “preemptive WAR” and “the global WAR on terror” placed the Persian Gulf region at the heart of his post-9/11 strategic vision. The Bush administration used the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington as a great opportunity to revamp the regional SECURITY by undertaking some drastic measures. The invasion of Iraq in March 2003, the idea of regime change in IRAN as well as other American Neocons’ grandiose plans about the necessity to reshape the “Greater Middle East”, made governments in the region nervous. In addition, by giving prominence to the “security question” over all other considerations, the US policy plunged the region deeper into uncertainty.Washington has systematically tried, and to a large extent succeeded, to securitize the inter-state relations in the region. This approach combined with the NATO plan to further its regional partnership, made any significant rapprochement among the Persian Gulf states on the issue of SECURITY almost impossible. For these reasons, a collective regionally crafted SECURITY ARRANGEMENT that includes littoral states of IRAN, Iraq the countries of Persian Gulf Cooperation Council would be unattainable in a foreseeable future.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    MOSSALANEJAD, ABBAS. (2013). U.S OFFENSIVE POLICY TOWARD IRAN’S SECURITY IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND PERSIAN GULF AFTER 33 DAY’S WAR. GEOPOLITICS QUARTERLY, 8(4 (28)), 115-134. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/116007/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MOSSALANEJAD ABBAS. U.S OFFENSIVE POLICY TOWARD IRAN’S SECURITY IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND PERSIAN GULF AFTER 33 DAY’S WAR. GEOPOLITICS QUARTERLY[Internet]. 2013;8(4 (28)):115-134. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/116007/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ABBAS MOSSALANEJAD, “U.S OFFENSIVE POLICY TOWARD IRAN’S SECURITY IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND PERSIAN GULF AFTER 33 DAY’S WAR,” GEOPOLITICS QUARTERLY, vol. 8, no. 4 (28), pp. 115–134, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/116007/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button