From training to Exam: a Comparative Analysis of M.A. and Ph.D Exams of Knowledge and Information Science with Curriculum

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Akhshik Somaye Sadat; Rajabali Beglou Reza

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Library and Information Science Research Year:2021 | Volume: | Issue: Page(s): 281-299

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

From training to Exam: a Comparative Analysis of M.A. and Ph.D Exams of Knowledge and Information Science with Curriculum

Author(s)

Akhshik Somaye Sadat | Rajabali Beglou Reza | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

M.A. examQ4

Ph.D examQ4

curriculumQ4

Knowledge and information scienceQ4

Bloom's revised taxonomyQ4

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to analyze the M.A. and Ph.D exams of Knowledge and information science discipline and compare them with B.A. and M.A. curricula. This comparison was carried out based on Bloom's revised taxonomy in two aspects of the status of the dimensions of knowledge (factual, conceptual, procedural and metacognitive) and the status of cognitive skills (remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate and create). Methodology: This study is an applied research with qualitative approach, using content behavioral goals of the curriculum analysis method (qualitative and quantitative). The research population was the questions of M.A. and Ph.D exams of Knowledge and information science in 2014-2018. The tool of this research was a check list based on the Bloom revised classification scheme by Anderson & Krathwohl (2001). For data analysis software MAXQDA 2018 was used, and the reliability test by using intercoder agreement was 91.2%. Findings: Findings showed low appropriateness between behavioral goals of B.A. curriculum and M.A. exam questions in two dimensions of knowledge and cognitive skills as well as between behavioral goals of M.A. curricula and Ph.D exam questions in cognitive skills, but in knowledge dimension there is some proportianallity. Conclusion: The behavioral goals of B.A. and M.A. need to be revised. Based on this revision and change, it’s also necessary to create a content change in the M.A. and Ph.D exams.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops