THE NATURE OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ‘OUGHT AND OUGHT NOT’ IN ETHICS AND ‘IS AND ISN’T’ IN SCIENCE AND PHILOSOPHY FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF CONTEMPORARY THINKERS AND ALLAMEH TABATABAEE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

TALEB TASH ABDULMAJID

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: PAZHUHESH NAME-YE QURAN VA HADITH Year:2011 | Volume:- | Issue:8 Page(s): 79-98

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

768

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE NATURE OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ‘OUGHT AND OUGHT NOT’ IN ETHICS AND ‘IS AND ISN’T’ IN SCIENCE AND PHILOSOPHY FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF CONTEMPORARY THINKERS AND ALLAMEH TABATABAEE

Author(s)

TALEB TASH ABDULMAJID | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

REAL “IS AND ISN’T”Q3

ARBITRARY ‘OUGHT AND OUGHT NOT’Q3

MUSLIM SCHOLARSQ3

EUROPEAN TRENDSQ3

LOGICAL INFERENCEQ3

RELATIONSHIPQ2

ALLAMEH TABATABAEEQ2

Abstract

In Europe, a school of thought was formed by Hume, the Scottish philosopher, on the subject of the nature of the RELATIONSHIP between science and religion and following this on the nature of the RELATIONSHIP between science and ethics and the standing of ‘ought and ought not’ in ethics.Considering science and ethics separate is the outcome of the attempts of those who reconsidered the RELATIONSHIP between God and the world. They regarded religious and ethical propositions as the product of man’s internal sentiments and insisted on separating it from objective realities. From this perspective, human intellect has no role to play in discovering ethical propositions because logic doesn’t apply to them and they cannot be verified. Although this point of view has been accepted by a small number of MUSLIM SCHOLARS, almost all MUSLIM SCHOLARS disagree with it and have rejected it on the basis of logical reasoning. This group of scholars believe that although ethics is not logically generated from science and philosophy, it is not essentially possible to offer an ethical proposition without depending on objective reality. Islamic scholars believe that there is a priority and posteriority RELATIONSHIP between ‘ought and ought not’ in ethics and ‘is and isn’t’ in science and philosophy, that is, after being informed about a scientific reality by means of theoretical intellect, man finds out the way to achieve that objective reality in the real world aided by practical intellect.Then, he expresses that in the form of recommendatory propositions and ethical ‘oughts’. In fact, these scholars do not consider the generation of value from knowledge a logical process, rather, they believe that it is based on two propositions: one scientific and the other ethical. They hold that practical intellect as a posterior instrument makes use of the power of the theoretical intellect as an anterior instrument, gains access to ethical recommendations and offers them in the form of ‘ought and ought not’. This is the same kind of RELATIONSHIP that exists between science and philosophy, on the one hand, and ethics, on the other, since practical intellect cannot stipulate anything without knowledge and deliberation.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

TALEB TASH, ABDULMAJID. (2011). THE NATURE OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ‘OUGHT AND OUGHT NOT’ IN ETHICS AND ‘IS AND ISN’T’ IN SCIENCE AND PHILOSOPHY FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF CONTEMPORARY THINKERS AND ALLAMEH TABATABAEE. PAZHUHESH NAME-YE QURAN VA HADITH, -(8), 79-98. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/119694/en

Vancouver: Copy

TALEB TASH ABDULMAJID. THE NATURE OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ‘OUGHT AND OUGHT NOT’ IN ETHICS AND ‘IS AND ISN’T’ IN SCIENCE AND PHILOSOPHY FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF CONTEMPORARY THINKERS AND ALLAMEH TABATABAEE. PAZHUHESH NAME-YE QURAN VA HADITH[Internet]. 2011;-(8):79-98. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/119694/en

IEEE: Copy

ABDULMAJID TALEB TASH, “THE NATURE OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ‘OUGHT AND OUGHT NOT’ IN ETHICS AND ‘IS AND ISN’T’ IN SCIENCE AND PHILOSOPHY FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF CONTEMPORARY THINKERS AND ALLAMEH TABATABAEE,” PAZHUHESH NAME-YE QURAN VA HADITH, vol. -, no. 8, pp. 79–98, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/119694/en

Related Journal Papers