A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF KOLAINI’S KAFI, AND THE SAHIH OF BUKHARI

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

GHAEI AHMAD REZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: SAFINEH Year:2008 | Volume:5 | Issue:19 (SPECIAL ISSUE ON AL-KAFI) Page(s): 37-77

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

3,770

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF KOLAINI’S KAFI, AND THE SAHIH OF BUKHARI

Author(s)

GHAEI AHMAD REZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Not Registered.

Abstract

This article is a scientific comparative research about 2 old Shi’ite and Sunni collections of traditions, i.e. al-Kafi of Kolaini, and the Sahih of Bukhari, from 5 viewpoints:1. The values and steps of the above books and authors in the eyes of the Shi’ite and Sunni scholars respectively (The compliments of the Sunni scholars towards Bukhari and his "Sahih", and some of the admiring words of the Shi’ite writers about al-Kafi and its author, and the purpose of its compilation are given.)2. The characters, authenticity, and competence of both writers in their communities, and the authenticity of Shaikh Kolaini acknowledged by some of the prominent Sunni writers such as Baghavi and Ibne Athir;3. The authenticity of attribution of the above books to their authors, and the times of their compilations;4. The arrangements of the 2 books; quantitative comparison of the collected traditions, the chapters and parts; and qualitative comparison of the collected traditions in each book according to their contents and depth of meanings;5. The grade of accuracy or weakness, and the right (false) attribution of the collected traditions in each of the 2 books, to the holy prophet and other infallible Imams, are also discussed.Some of documents, witnesses, and narrators in Sahih of Bukhari are proved to be weak and unreliable. Some hints and indications about prejudice of Bukhari, and his negative view towards Imam Ali and other holy Imams from the household of the prophet Muhammad (p.b.u.t); and his negligence toward his contemporary infallible Imam, Imam Sadeq, are provided and discussed.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

GHAEI, AHMAD REZA. (2008). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF KOLAINI’S KAFI, AND THE SAHIH OF BUKHARI. SAFINEH, 5(19 (SPECIAL ISSUE ON AL-KAFI)), 37-77. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/119789/en

Vancouver: Copy

GHAEI AHMAD REZA. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF KOLAINI’S KAFI, AND THE SAHIH OF BUKHARI. SAFINEH[Internet]. 2008;5(19 (SPECIAL ISSUE ON AL-KAFI)):37-77. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/119789/en

IEEE: Copy

AHMAD REZA GHAEI, “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF KOLAINI’S KAFI, AND THE SAHIH OF BUKHARI,” SAFINEH, vol. 5, no. 19 (SPECIAL ISSUE ON AL-KAFI), pp. 37–77, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/119789/en

Related Journal Papers