Identifying and Prioritizing Professional Ethics Indicators in Research

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KHANI JAZANI JAMAL; JAFARI SAHAR; ARAB ALIREZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Ethics in Science and Technology Year:2019 | Volume:14 | Issue:3 Page(s): 99-107

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,238

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Identifying and Prioritizing Professional Ethics Indicators in Research

Author(s)

KHANI JAZANI JAMAL | JAFARI SAHAR | ARAB ALIREZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Professional ethicsQ1

ResearchQ1

Decision-makingQ1

Abstract

Background The role of the valid Research and its proper implementation in the overall ascendency state of the society is obvious, and the promotion of the quality of Research and, consequently, the improvement of the life and welfare of the people of society in the light of moral values is possible. The advancement of science will be possible in the shade of all the principles of Professional ethics of Research. In this regard, it is appropriate to identify and prioritize Research ethics indicators and their importance. Method This Research in terms of the purpose is practical and in terms of collecting information is descriptive-survey. Statistical population is consisting of faculty members of Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology, 17 experts were selected. About selecting experts we have used targeted sampling. To identify Indicators, we use library method and for settling and prioritizing, we use questionnaire. About data analysis methods, fuzzy Delphi method for riddling and fixing the indicators and the best-worst method to determining the relative importance of Research method are determined. Results After analyzing data, 18 indicators during three phases of doing F-Delphi method are confirmed and chosen. The convergence index is less than 0. 2 that indicated complete validation of results. According to the solution of the linear-modeling method of the best-worst method, the relative importance of the indicators is determined and consistency rate is in an acceptable level, showed the validity of results. Conclusion The results indicate that considering the welfare of society, respect for justice and preservation of unity at the macro level and respect for intellectual property rights are the most important indicators of Professional ethics in Research, respectively.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KHANI JAZANI, JAMAL, JAFARI, SAHAR, & ARAB, ALIREZA. (2019). Identifying and Prioritizing Professional Ethics Indicators in Research. ETHICS IN SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 14(3 ), 99-107. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/122983/en

Vancouver: Copy

KHANI JAZANI JAMAL, JAFARI SAHAR, ARAB ALIREZA. Identifying and Prioritizing Professional Ethics Indicators in Research. ETHICS IN SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY[Internet]. 2019;14(3 ):99-107. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/122983/en

IEEE: Copy

JAMAL KHANI JAZANI, SAHAR JAFARI, and ALIREZA ARAB, “Identifying and Prioritizing Professional Ethics Indicators in Research,” ETHICS IN SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, vol. 14, no. 3 , pp. 99–107, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/122983/en

Related Journal Papers