A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL VIEWS OF DUNS SCOTUS AND IBN SINA

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ABBASZADEH MAHDI

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Wisdom and Philosophy Year:2010 | Volume:6 | Issue:3 (23) Page(s): 53-74

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

636

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL VIEWS OF DUNS SCOTUS AND IBN SINA

Author(s)

ABBASZADEH MAHDI | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

KNOWLEDGEQ2

PERCEPTIONQ2

SENSEQ2

IMAGINATIONQ2

REASONQ2

ACTIVE INTELLECTQ2

INTUITIONQ2

ILLUMINATIONQ2

CERTAINTYQ2

Abstract

This paper is an endeavor to conduct a comparative study of the viewpoints of Johannes Duns Scotus, Scottish philosopher and theologian (1266- 1308), on epistemology and KNOWLEDGE, and Ibn Sina’s beliefs on the same issues. Given the fact that Scotus had studied the Latin translation of Ibn Sina's book, al-Shifa, the present study provides evidence as to how Scotus was influenced by Ibn Sina’s viewpoints under such issues as PERCEPTIONal faculties, process of PERCEPTION, natural object of REASON, kinds of KNOWLEDGE, levels of CERTAINTY, etc.While Scotus and Ibn Sina had been both influenced by Aristotle and the peripatetic tradition, there are still observed differences between them. Logical REASONs, therefore, urge us to conduct a comparative study concerning the viewpoints of the two thinkers. With the above in mind, we will take into consideration the different atmospheres and cultures in which they lived; living and thus thinking in a Christian environment for one, and in an Islamic atmosphere for the other.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ABBASZADEH, MAHDI. (2010). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL VIEWS OF DUNS SCOTUS AND IBN SINA. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), 6(3 (23)), 53-74. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/123442/en

Vancouver: Copy

ABBASZADEH MAHDI. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL VIEWS OF DUNS SCOTUS AND IBN SINA. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY)[Internet]. 2010;6(3 (23)):53-74. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/123442/en

IEEE: Copy

MAHDI ABBASZADEH, “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL VIEWS OF DUNS SCOTUS AND IBN SINA,” HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), vol. 6, no. 3 (23), pp. 53–74, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/123442/en

Related Journal Papers