A WAY TO RESOLVE THE CONFLICT LYOTARD AND HABERMAS ON LANGUAGE AND CONSENSUS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AJILI HADI; SOLGI MOHSEN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Wisdom and Philosophy Year:2016 | Volume:12 | Issue:3 Page(s): 7-28

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

585

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A WAY TO RESOLVE THE CONFLICT LYOTARD AND HABERMAS ON LANGUAGE AND CONSENSUS

Author(s)

AJILI HADI | SOLGI MOHSEN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CONSENSUSQ2

MULTICULTURALISMQ1

SOCIAL ACTIVISM CAMPAIGNQ1

A PLURALITYQ2

Abstract

Lyotard, influenced by Wittgenstein and language games asserts the primacy of "diversity and difference" in But, society Habermas seek "CONSENSUS" and therefore domains an organic whole society and one that is looking at Structuralist view Saussure' s language. Wittgenstein in "functional theory of meaning" interprets the language in which, speaking of "life forms or forms of the game" and "event locations" is present. Thus, he can no longer look from the perspective of holistic, rational and systematic in there. In contrast, Habermas Looks holistic, as Wittgenstein and Lyotard rejected language as well as rational and holistic look at the language of the cast. In this article, is it attempted to criticize to the radical view of Lyotard and his interpretation of language games and then to criticize Habermas, with adjustments in the views of these two philosophers, conflict the solve between them. In this way, the use of mediation CM-theory agonism- and philosopher Charles Taylor -idea MULTICULTURALISM-as two other Wittgenstein an or at least very impressed by her, are responsible for the reconciliation between the of views the Lyotard and Habermas. The main question is what the is between relation the is Wittgenstein and Anti-Wittgensteinian thought of language? The main claim is that is not ratio the accompanied.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

AJILI, HADI, & SOLGI, MOHSEN. (2016). A WAY TO RESOLVE THE CONFLICT LYOTARD AND HABERMAS ON LANGUAGE AND CONSENSUS. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), 12(3 ), 7-28. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/123449/en

Vancouver: Copy

AJILI HADI, SOLGI MOHSEN. A WAY TO RESOLVE THE CONFLICT LYOTARD AND HABERMAS ON LANGUAGE AND CONSENSUS. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY)[Internet]. 2016;12(3 ):7-28. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/123449/en

IEEE: Copy

HADI AJILI, and MOHSEN SOLGI, “A WAY TO RESOLVE THE CONFLICT LYOTARD AND HABERMAS ON LANGUAGE AND CONSENSUS,” HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), vol. 12, no. 3 , pp. 7–28, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/123449/en

Related Journal Papers