CONDITIONAL LOGIC AND ITS PHILOSOPHICAL BASES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

RASOOLI SHARABIANI REZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Wisdom and Philosophy Year:2009 | Volume:4 | Issue:4 (16) Page(s): 71-83

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,439

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CONDITIONAL LOGIC AND ITS PHILOSOPHICAL BASES

Author(s)

RASOOLI SHARABIANI REZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PREDICATIVE LOGICQ3

CONDITIONAL LOGICQ3

PHILOSOPY OF LOGICQ3

Abstract

It is one of the basic questions of the Logic that why Aristotle has not dealt with CONDITIONAL LOGIC. How has the very originator of logic not paid any attention to such an important topic? Has this carelessness been some kind of ignorance or has it been deliberated and Aristotle has had good reasons for that? In this article, after having examined the CONDITIONAL LOGIC (conditional syllogism and proposition) from the stoics' point of view and explaining its significance for modern logicians, theoretical and philosophical bases of the two systems of predicative and CONDITIONAL LOGIC have been discussed.With studying Aristotle's philosophy and having in mind his specific views regarding categories and the insertion of the things in The Ten Categories we can conclude that Aristotle has had an essence-based way of thinking and this is completely different from empirical thinking of the stoics, because stoics deal with external laws of the things in their philosophical thinking, rather than with essence and nature of the things. Therefore, the stoics have deviated from the PREDICATIVE LOGIC and have focused on CONDITIONAL LOGIC, because this kind of viewing the beings does not have the necessities of an insertion and predicative system. In the same way that, we cannot speak conditionally and dubiously with a class-based look at the world's beings. In other words, regarding Aristotle's philosophical and ontological bases, we cannot accept CONDITIONAL LOGIC. For this reason, Aristotle has not entered discussing conditional syllogism and proposition in his works, whereas Megara school have dealt with these discussions before Aristotle, and after him this discussion has been seriously followed by the stoics, because it has been more compatible with their ontology.

Multimedia

No record.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

RASOOLI SHARABIANI, REZA. (2009). CONDITIONAL LOGIC AND ITS PHILOSOPHICAL BASES. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), 4(4 (16)), 71-83. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/123458/en

Vancouver: Copy

RASOOLI SHARABIANI REZA. CONDITIONAL LOGIC AND ITS PHILOSOPHICAL BASES. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY)[Internet]. 2009;4(4 (16)):71-83. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/123458/en

IEEE: Copy

REZA RASOOLI SHARABIANI, “CONDITIONAL LOGIC AND ITS PHILOSOPHICAL BASES,” HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), vol. 4, no. 4 (16), pp. 71–83, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/123458/en

Related Journal Papers