ARGUMENT OF WITTGENSTEIN'S DIARIST IN REJECTING PRIVATE LANGUAGE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HESAMIFAR ABDUL RAZZAQ

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Wisdom and Philosophy Year:2015 | Volume:11 | Issue:1 (41) Page(s): 49-68

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

824

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

ARGUMENT OF WITTGENSTEIN'S DIARIST IN REJECTING PRIVATE LANGUAGE

Author(s)

HESAMIFAR ABDUL RAZZAQ | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PRIVATE LANGUAGEQ2

DIARIST ARGUMENTQ2

WITTGENSTEINQ2

MEMORYQ2

SENSATIONQ2

COMMON LANGUAGEQ2

CRITERION OF TRUTHQ2

Abstract

The refuting of PRIVATE LANGUAGE is one of the important ideas of later WITTGENSTEIN; a language whose words are only known for its user. To justify impossibility of the PRIVATE LANGUAGE, WITTGENSTEIN in his diary argument shows that it is impossible for a person to name one of hisown SENSATIONs by using a sign like “S” and to write it in his diary and then he cannot register its repetition in his diary. There are many interpretations of this argument. Some consider it as an argument against the validity of MEMORY and some others consider it as an emphasis on the necessity of rules for using the words in a language. Skepticism in the validity of MEMORY sometime is related to the ability of MEMORY in keeping the first SENSATION and sometime is related to the ability of MEMORY in correct remembering of using of a sign in the past. The commentators mostly accepted the first part and according to their view, since there is no objective criterion for assessment of use of a sign, the possibility of assessing the correctness of MEMORY function in PRIVATE LANGUAGE is denied. In this article, some interpretations of DIARIST ARGUMENT are investigated.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HESAMIFAR, ABDUL RAZZAQ. (2015). ARGUMENT OF WITTGENSTEIN'S DIARIST IN REJECTING PRIVATE LANGUAGE. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), 11(1 (41)), 49-68. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/123464/en

Vancouver: Copy

HESAMIFAR ABDUL RAZZAQ. ARGUMENT OF WITTGENSTEIN'S DIARIST IN REJECTING PRIVATE LANGUAGE. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY)[Internet]. 2015;11(1 (41)):49-68. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/123464/en

IEEE: Copy

ABDUL RAZZAQ HESAMIFAR, “ARGUMENT OF WITTGENSTEIN'S DIARIST IN REJECTING PRIVATE LANGUAGE,” HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), vol. 11, no. 1 (41), pp. 49–68, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/123464/en

Related Journal Papers