مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

732
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE EVALUATION OF THE WITTGENSTEIN’S WAY AND DESCARTES’ ONE IN OVERCOMING THE PROBLEM OF DUALISM WITH EMPHESIS ON CONNECTION BETWEEN THEM

Pages

  63-82

Abstract

 This article is an attempt to address a main question: is there any connection between WITTGENSTEIN’s way and DESCARTES’ one in overcoming the problem of DUALISM? The discussion of the position of WITTGENSTEIN on DESCARTESDUALISM here begins with the private language argument. For understanding DESCARTES’ position on the issue, one of his correspondences with Princess Elisabeth, and also the concept of the nature in his book the Meditation are examined so as to be shown this connection, regardless of many central differences between them. Moreover, it is shown here that the relatively similar ways of these two philosophers for facing the problem of DUALISM are in fact the ways for dissolving the matter, rather than solving it. It means that there seems to be no way to solve the problem of DESCARTES’s DUALISM on the basis of his own works, and this problem can only be overcome by getting out of his philosophy- the thing that both WITTGENSTEIN and DESCARTES actually did. This article, therefore, takes this reading as its main idea that the WITTGENSTEIN’s attack on DESCARTES’s DUALISM in particular, and on DESCARTES’s philosophy in general, is a fundamental criticism that comes from his critical point of view about the nature of philosophy itself; and the DESCARTES’s way which was mentioned above can be justified only in such a this context.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    MESHKAT, MOHAMMAD, & MAZHABI, JAFAR. (2017). THE EVALUATION OF THE WITTGENSTEIN’S WAY AND DESCARTES’ ONE IN OVERCOMING THE PROBLEM OF DUALISM WITH EMPHESIS ON CONNECTION BETWEEN THEM. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), 13(3 ), 63-82. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/123479/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MESHKAT MOHAMMAD, MAZHABI JAFAR. THE EVALUATION OF THE WITTGENSTEIN’S WAY AND DESCARTES’ ONE IN OVERCOMING THE PROBLEM OF DUALISM WITH EMPHESIS ON CONNECTION BETWEEN THEM. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY)[Internet]. 2017;13(3 ):63-82. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/123479/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MOHAMMAD MESHKAT, and JAFAR MAZHABI, “THE EVALUATION OF THE WITTGENSTEIN’S WAY AND DESCARTES’ ONE IN OVERCOMING THE PROBLEM OF DUALISM WITH EMPHESIS ON CONNECTION BETWEEN THEM,” HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), vol. 13, no. 3 , pp. 63–82, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/123479/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button