مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

334
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Negativity and the Critique of Tradition through Mystical Tradition

Author(s)

Taliehbakhsh Monireh | GHOLAMHOSSEINZADEH GHOLAMHOSSEIN | NIKOUEI ALIREZA | moinzadeh mehdi | Issue Writer Certificate 

Pages

  165-194

Abstract

 The first trace of the Critique of objective truth and the “ present-at-hand” Tradition can be found in Sufism and Mysticism. Mystics emphasize the outstanding role of uncovering and intuition which implies the desire to leave mediators in order to achieve the truth and reflects their creative approach toward Tradition, which, while rooted in Tradition, is seen as revival. They considered the truth of their approach to Tradition as a Naghd/Critique. Naghd, in common terms, is simply translated as the assessment of something. However, in the mystical Tradition, it is prior to assessment and refers to calling something that is “ ready to hand” existence. Today, the way through this Tradition is being inquired about and though about is groundless. Groundlessness is the indicator of the dichotomy of Tradition and modernity, whereas the original foundation through the experience of a moment of "negation" is an abyss/ the nothing foundation. This article will begin with two fundamental theoretical approaches in Western thought to understand the foundations of the mystic approach to Tradition. The first approach is "Romantic Hermeneutics, Historicism, Fundamentalism, and Traditionalism, " which comprehends Tradition as it has been spent, and the second approach with titles such as "philosophical hermeneutics, historicity and Traditionality" considers Tradition as something present now. This article proves that both Tradition and modernity adopt the same approach while the second approach implies a different perception of the foundation / beginning, time and existence.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Taliehbakhsh, Monireh, GHOLAMHOSSEINZADEH, GHOLAMHOSSEIN, NIKOUEI, ALIREZA, & moinzadeh, mehdi. (2019). Negativity and the Critique of Tradition through Mystical Tradition. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), 15(1 (57) ), 165-194. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/123494/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Taliehbakhsh Monireh, GHOLAMHOSSEINZADEH GHOLAMHOSSEIN, NIKOUEI ALIREZA, moinzadeh mehdi. Negativity and the Critique of Tradition through Mystical Tradition. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY)[Internet]. 2019;15(1 (57) ):165-194. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/123494/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Monireh Taliehbakhsh, GHOLAMHOSSEIN GHOLAMHOSSEINZADEH, ALIREZA NIKOUEI, and mehdi moinzadeh, “Negativity and the Critique of Tradition through Mystical Tradition,” HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), vol. 15, no. 1 (57) , pp. 165–194, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/123494/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top