THE METHOD OF RAWLS THEORY OF JUSTICE: SOME IMPORTANT CRITICISMS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SHAGHOOL YOUSSEF; SEFIDKHOSH MAYSAM

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Wisdom and Philosophy Year:2010 | Volume:6 | Issue:2 (22) Page(s): 91-103

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,129

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE METHOD OF RAWLS THEORY OF JUSTICE: SOME IMPORTANT CRITICISMS

Author(s)

SHAGHOOL YOUSSEF | SEFIDKHOSH MAYSAM | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

THE METHODOLOGY OF RAWLS THEORYQ3

FICTIONALIZATIONQ2

RIGHT-BASEDQ2

GOAL BASED AND DUTY BASED THEORIESQ3

ORIGINAL POSITIONQ3

Abstract

Rawls’ theory of justice enjoys all characteristics of a comprehensive conceptual system, and like any such a system, it embraces a special method nature of which has a definite influence on the content of the theory. The main methodological concepts of his theory consist in the ideas of the contract doctrine, the ORIGINAL POSITION, the veil of ignorance and the reflective equilibrium. The content of these concepts and their relationships with each other's and also with other relavant concepts in a cpmprehensive political theory is one of the most important qustions to which commentators and critics have payed attention. For instance, Doworkin has analized the relations between Rawlsian methodology RIGHT-BASED, goal-based and duty-based theories and aloso the constituitive and the natural model. Tomas Nigel is in about this claim that the final result derived from the Rawlsian method would lead to a just position. Calling Rwals` method a kind of `fictionalization`, Davide Hall has objected the possibility of actualization of this theory. In this paper, we try to focus on and categorize some important critical viwes conerning the Rawlsian methodology.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

SHAGHOOL, YOUSSEF, & SEFIDKHOSH, MAYSAM. (2010). THE METHOD OF RAWLS THEORY OF JUSTICE: SOME IMPORTANT CRITICISMS. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), 6(2 (22)), 91-103. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/123512/en

Vancouver: Copy

SHAGHOOL YOUSSEF, SEFIDKHOSH MAYSAM. THE METHOD OF RAWLS THEORY OF JUSTICE: SOME IMPORTANT CRITICISMS. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY)[Internet]. 2010;6(2 (22)):91-103. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/123512/en

IEEE: Copy

YOUSSEF SHAGHOOL, and MAYSAM SEFIDKHOSH, “THE METHOD OF RAWLS THEORY OF JUSTICE: SOME IMPORTANT CRITICISMS,” HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), vol. 6, no. 2 (22), pp. 91–103, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/123512/en

Related Journal Papers