GADAMER AND HIRSCH’S CHALLENGE ON THE ACCURACY OF HERMENEUTICS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

IZADINIA HAMIDEH; VAEZI ASGHAR

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Wisdom and Philosophy Year:2014 | Volume:10 | Issue:3 (39) Page(s): 45-58

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,285

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

GADAMER AND HIRSCH’S CHALLENGE ON THE ACCURACY OF HERMENEUTICS

Author(s)

IZADINIA HAMIDEH | VAEZI ASGHAR | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CONTEXTUALQ2

CRITERIA FOR VALIDITYQ2

FALLIBILITYQ2

INTENTION OF AUTHORQ2

LANGUAGEQ2

LITERAL MEANINGQ2

MEANING FOR USQ2

UNDERSTANDINGQ2

Abstract

Hirsch is of the belief that Gadamer’s hermeneutics theory leads to pluralism and relativism. Following romantic hermeneutic scholars, Hirsch believes the aim of reading a text to be achieving the goal of the author. Gadamer, however, believes that UNDERSTANDING is to reach an agreement and compatibility with the other, not to reach his or her intention. Therefore, Hirsch believes that the meaning of text is predetermined and the aim of reading is to discover this meaning. Gadamer, however, believes that meaning is produced as result of dialog between an interpreter and the text, and, therefore, there’s no such thing as a predetermined text. Based on this view, Gadamer regard LANGUAGE and its tools as the conditions of determining meaning, but Hirsch believes that LANGUAGE is merely an instrument of revealing meaning. From another point of view, Hirsch accuses Gadamer of lacking criteria. When meaning is an undetermined concept, there will be no criteria to distinguish correct interpretation from an incorrect one. In this paper, we aim to introduce Hirsch’s three main criticisms against Gadamer and also provide responses to these criticisms based on the views of Gadamer’s advocates.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

IZADINIA, HAMIDEH, & VAEZI, ASGHAR. (2014). GADAMER AND HIRSCH’S CHALLENGE ON THE ACCURACY OF HERMENEUTICS. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), 10(3 (39)), 45-58. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/123519/en

Vancouver: Copy

IZADINIA HAMIDEH, VAEZI ASGHAR. GADAMER AND HIRSCH’S CHALLENGE ON THE ACCURACY OF HERMENEUTICS. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY)[Internet]. 2014;10(3 (39)):45-58. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/123519/en

IEEE: Copy

HAMIDEH IZADINIA, and ASGHAR VAEZI, “GADAMER AND HIRSCH’S CHALLENGE ON THE ACCURACY OF HERMENEUTICS,” HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), vol. 10, no. 3 (39), pp. 45–58, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/123519/en

Related Journal Papers