A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON INDUCTIVE METHODOLOGY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AFZALI J.KH.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Ma`rifat Falsafi Year:2008 | Volume:5 | Issue:3 (19) Page(s): 117-144

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

4,636

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON INDUCTIVE METHODOLOGY

Author(s)

AFZALI J.KH. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

INDUCTIONQ2

EXPERIMENTQ2

CERTAINTYQ2

DEDUCTIONQ2

SUBJECTIVE REPRODUCTIONQ3

Abstract

INDUCTION is one of the most important methods available to human being for gaining knowledge of the world. This methodology, despite its import and advantages, seems to lack the potential for philosophical CERTAINTY. Philosophical CERTAINTY is gained only if there were a logical, and thus productive, relation between premises of an argument and its conclusion (the same as in the case of DEDUCTION). This is while there is a logical gap between the premises of an INDUCTION and its conclusion, leaving them with no productive connection. The question, then, arises as to how one can rely on an INDUCTION, and still admit of the fact that its result is not definitive. The author in this article reviews, compares, and bricfly criticizes different attempts at resolving this issue. He juxtaposes the technical term, INDUCTION, in the both Islamic and Western intellectual environments to show their divergences and to reveal confusions that have arisen from lack of sensitivity to such differences.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

AFZALI, J.KH.. (2008). A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON INDUCTIVE METHODOLOGY. MARIFAT-I FALSAFI, 5(3 (19)), 117-144. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/123925/en

Vancouver: Copy

AFZALI J.KH.. A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON INDUCTIVE METHODOLOGY. MARIFAT-I FALSAFI[Internet]. 2008;5(3 (19)):117-144. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/123925/en

IEEE: Copy

J.KH. AFZALI, “A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON INDUCTIVE METHODOLOGY,” MARIFAT-I FALSAFI, vol. 5, no. 3 (19), pp. 117–144, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/123925/en

Related Journal Papers