The Possibility of Prime Negation in Logic and Epistemology On the Basis of Foundationalism

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Soleymani Amiri Askari

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Ma`rifat Falsafi Year:2018 | Volume:16 | Issue:1 (61) Page(s): 97-109

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

502

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The Possibility of Prime Negation in Logic and Epistemology On the Basis of Foundationalism

Author(s)

Soleymani Amiri Askari | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

foundationalismQ2

axiomatic negationQ1

theoretical negationQ1

science’s rootsQ1

AristotleQ2

AvicennaQ2

Abstract

All derivative propositions return to self-evident propositions; and sciences thus end and lead to their origin. According to this foundation, some have thought that all negations are theoretical and there is no axiomatic negation, because for them, negating attribute from the subject always necessities a middle term that proves one feature for the subject and prepares the ground for negating an attribute from the subject through that term. Thus, the axiomatic negation is not sensible without a middle term. This is, however, rejected by Avicenna and Aristotle. For them, just as the theoretical affirmation leads to axiomatic affirmations through analysis, and just as accepting an axiomatic affirmation is sensible without a middle term, the same rational reason that makes us accept axiomatic affirmations makes us accept axiomatic negations as well. Just as accepting theoretical affirmations without leading to axiomatic affirmations would necessarily result in vicious circle, accepting theoretical negation without their leading to axiomatic negations would necessarily result in vicious circle and finally a contradiction which is rejected.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Soleymani Amiri, Askari. (2018). The Possibility of Prime Negation in Logic and Epistemology On the Basis of Foundationalism. MARIFAT-I FALSAFI, 16(1 (61) ), 97-109. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/123958/en

Vancouver: Copy

Soleymani Amiri Askari. The Possibility of Prime Negation in Logic and Epistemology On the Basis of Foundationalism. MARIFAT-I FALSAFI[Internet]. 2018;16(1 (61) ):97-109. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/123958/en

IEEE: Copy

Askari Soleymani Amiri, “The Possibility of Prime Negation in Logic and Epistemology On the Basis of Foundationalism,” MARIFAT-I FALSAFI, vol. 16, no. 1 (61) , pp. 97–109, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/123958/en

Related Journal Papers