The Status of ‘ Attribution’ in the Discussion of Principality of Existence and Quiddity

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

NIKZAD ABBAS

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Ma`rifat Falsafi Year:2020 | Volume:17 | Issue:2 (66) Page(s): 55-65

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

469

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The Status of ‘ Attribution’ in the Discussion of Principality of Existence and Quiddity

Author(s)

NIKZAD ABBAS | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

principality of existenceQ2

conventionality of quiddityQ2

attributionQ2

primary attributionQ2

ordinary attributionQ2

medium in accidentsQ2

Abstract

One of the basic issues in philosophy is the principality of existence or quiddity. It has been regarded as a breakthrough in the philosophy. The proponents of Mulla Sadra (Sadraids) believe in principality of existence and conventionality of quiddity. Mulla Sadra was the first philosopher who put this issue at the top of the discussions on ontology, making it the foundation for resolving other issues. To prove their claim, his proponents have adduced some reasons, the most important of which is based on the axis of ‘ attribution’ . That is, with a reliance on attribution, they have offered arguments that denote the principality of existence and conventionality of quiddity. In this regard, some of the effects they claim for the belief in principality of existence and conventionality of quiddity are related to ‘ attribution’ . In the present article, we study both the arguments presented and the effects related to the attribution. For the author, there are serious critics regarding both parts of the discussion.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

NIKZAD, ABBAS. (2020). The Status of ‘ Attribution’ in the Discussion of Principality of Existence and Quiddity. MARIFAT-I FALSAFI, 17(2 (66) ), 55-65. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/123980/en

Vancouver: Copy

NIKZAD ABBAS. The Status of ‘ Attribution’ in the Discussion of Principality of Existence and Quiddity. MARIFAT-I FALSAFI[Internet]. 2020;17(2 (66) ):55-65. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/123980/en

IEEE: Copy

ABBAS NIKZAD, “The Status of ‘ Attribution’ in the Discussion of Principality of Existence and Quiddity,” MARIFAT-I FALSAFI, vol. 17, no. 2 (66) , pp. 55–65, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/123980/en

Related Journal Papers