A NEW INTERPRETATION OF ALLĀMAH TABĀTABĀ’I’S “CONVENTIONALS” (I’TIBĀRYĀT) BY COMPARING HIS TREATISE ON CONVENTIONALS WITH AL-MĪZĀN

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

TORKASHVAND E.; MIRSEPAH A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Ma`rifat Falsafi Year:2010 | Volume:8 | Issue:1 (29) Page(s): 25-54

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,013

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A NEW INTERPRETATION OF ALLĀMAH TABĀTABĀ’I’S “CONVENTIONALS” (I’TIBĀRYĀT) BY COMPARING HIS TREATISE ON CONVENTIONALS WITH AL-MĪZĀN

Author(s)

TORKASHVAND E. | MIRSEPAH A. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CONVENTIONALSQ2

GOODQ2

BADQ2

AUGHTQ2

IMPERATIVESQ3

ETHICAL VALUESQ2

ALLAMAH TABATABA’IQ2

AL-MIZANQ2

Abstract

Allamah Tabataba’i considers ethical IMPERATIVES as CONVENTIONALS which are human constructs for making an action obligatory. As for ethical evaluative concepts such as GOOD and BAD, he has two ideas, suggested in his different works: A) GOOD and BAD are conventional concepts conveying the appropriateness of an action with one’s temper or otherwise. Since people’s tempers differ, GOOD and BAD also can differ from one person to another. B) GOOD and BAD shows the congruence or incongruence of an action with favorable end.The authors in this article suggest that the second meaning shows that Allamah considers the concepts of GOOD and BAD to be secondary intelligibles, although he has not made it explicit. They think that it is important to draw the line between the two meanings in Allamah; a point which is ignored by others. The authors try to do this by juxtaposing Allamah’s ideas from his treatise on CONVENTIONALS and those in his Qur’anic exegesis, Al-Mizān to show the difference between his view and that of relativists and agnosticists.

Cites

THE STRUCTURE AND SUBSTANCE OF GOVERNMENT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF AIM AND MEANS IN THE LIGHT OF THE THEORY OF CONVENTIONS (E'TEBAARIAAT THEORY)

References

Cite

APA: Copy

TORKASHVAND, E., & MIRSEPAH, A.. (2010). A NEW INTERPRETATION OF ALLĀMAH TABĀTABĀ’I’S “CONVENTIONALS” (I’TIBĀRYĀT) BY COMPARING HIS TREATISE ON CONVENTIONALS WITH AL-MĪZĀN. MARIFAT-I FALSAFI, 8(1 (29)), 25-54. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/123997/en

Vancouver: Copy

TORKASHVAND E., MIRSEPAH A.. A NEW INTERPRETATION OF ALLĀMAH TABĀTABĀ’I’S “CONVENTIONALS” (I’TIBĀRYĀT) BY COMPARING HIS TREATISE ON CONVENTIONALS WITH AL-MĪZĀN. MARIFAT-I FALSAFI[Internet]. 2010;8(1 (29)):25-54. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/123997/en

IEEE: Copy

E. TORKASHVAND, and A. MIRSEPAH, “A NEW INTERPRETATION OF ALLĀMAH TABĀTABĀ’I’S “CONVENTIONALS” (I’TIBĀRYĀT) BY COMPARING HIS TREATISE ON CONVENTIONALS WITH AL-MĪZĀN,” MARIFAT-I FALSAFI, vol. 8, no. 1 (29), pp. 25–54, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/123997/en

Related Journal Papers