THE METHODOLOGY OF THEORIZATION IN HUMANITIES; WITH A REFLECTION ON MUSLIM THINKERS’ APPROACHES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

DANAEIFARD H.; BABAEI MOJARAD H.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Ma`rifat Falsafi Year:2010 | Volume:8 | Issue:1 (29) Page(s): 133-164

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,630

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE METHODOLOGY OF THEORIZATION IN HUMANITIES; WITH A REFLECTION ON MUSLIM THINKERS’ APPROACHES

Author(s)

DANAEIFARD H. | BABAEI MOJARAD H. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

RELATIVISMQ2

ABSOLUTISMQ3

METHODOLOGYQ2

INTERMEDIATE IJTIHĀDQ3

THEORIZINGQ2

PRODUCTION OF KNOWLEDGEQ2

RATIONAL SOURCESQ3

NARRATIVE SOURCESQ3

RELIGIOUS AUTHORITYQ1

HUMANITIESQ2

ISLAMQ2

Abstract

In the field of the philosophy of science, the process of knowledge development is based on three approaches, i.e. inductive, falsifications, and paradigmatic. Despite their differences in their ontology, epistemology, and METHODOLOGY, they all share in their relativistic approach to human understanding and knowledge.The authors in this article begin with introducing the three aforementioned approaches and their foundations. Then they turn to an ISLAMic approach towards the development of knowledge. The authors suggest a METHODOLOGY they call “intermediate ijtihād” in which all four causes (efficient, material, formal, and final causes) are taken into account, and therefore culminate in rational certainty and RELIGIOUS AUTHORITY. In this approach, the acquaintance with reality is possible through reason and authentic religious narratives, reality is not considered relative, and the basic principles of understanding will not change during time and in different places. It is also based on Divine worldview, and a cooperation of philosophy and science serves as an instrument, compensating for the shortcomings of modern sciences.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

DANAEIFARD, H., & BABAEI MOJARAD, H.. (2010). THE METHODOLOGY OF THEORIZATION IN HUMANITIES; WITH A REFLECTION ON MUSLIM THINKERS’ APPROACHES. MARIFAT-I FALSAFI, 8(1 (29)), 133-164. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/124001/en

Vancouver: Copy

DANAEIFARD H., BABAEI MOJARAD H.. THE METHODOLOGY OF THEORIZATION IN HUMANITIES; WITH A REFLECTION ON MUSLIM THINKERS’ APPROACHES. MARIFAT-I FALSAFI[Internet]. 2010;8(1 (29)):133-164. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/124001/en

IEEE: Copy

H. DANAEIFARD, and H. BABAEI MOJARAD, “THE METHODOLOGY OF THEORIZATION IN HUMANITIES; WITH A REFLECTION ON MUSLIM THINKERS’ APPROACHES,” MARIFAT-I FALSAFI, vol. 8, no. 1 (29), pp. 133–164, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/124001/en

Related Journal Papers