THE ARGUEMENT OF DEVOTEES FROM IBN SINA TO ALLAMAH TABATABA'I

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ORVATI MOVAFAGH A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Ayeneh Ma‘refat Year:2007 | Volume:- | Issue:10 Page(s): 117-140

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,969

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE ARGUEMENT OF DEVOTEES FROM IBN SINA TO ALLAMAH TABATABA'I

Author(s)

ORVATI MOVAFAGH A. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ARGUMENT OF DEVOTEESQ2

PRINCIPALITY OF EXISTENCEQ2

GRADATION OF BEINGQ2

SIMPLICITY OF BEINGQ3

Abstract

Islamic philosophers intend to devise a rational argument in which created beings do not function as intermediaries in the demonstration of Almighty Truth. Ibn Sina was the first to have adopted such a method and innovated an argument based on the above idea. He called his famous argument which is based on the division of existents in to necessary and possible ones, the possibles need a determinant in existence, and the impossibility of the infinite regression of causes, the "ARGUMENT OF DEVOTEES" and claimed that this argument is superior to all others propounded in the same regard. After Ibn Sina, some other Muslim philosophers such as Shaykh Shahab aI-Din Suhrawardi, Mulla Sadra, Hajj Mulla Hadi Sabziwari, and AIlamah Tabataba' I tried to formulate their arguments based on fewer premises. Hence, various interpretations of the ARGUMENT OF DEVOTEES have been offered in Islamic philosophy. The ARGUMENT OF DEVOTEES in the Transcendent Philosophy is other than that in Peripatetic Philosophy. Accordingly, Mulla Sadra believes that the later does not deserve to be called the ARGUMENT OF DEVOTEES. However the one propouned in Ishraqi philosophy, although incomplete in comparison to the one given in the Transcendent Philosophy, is closer to it. This argument became more complete after Mulla Sadra in that its premises were reduced in number; its purpose became clearer; and the way to attain it became shorter.The most complete and accurate interpretation of the argument of believers, after Mulla Sadra, has been offered by Ailamah Tabataba'i.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ORVATI MOVAFAGH, A.. (2007). THE ARGUEMENT OF DEVOTEES FROM IBN SINA TO ALLAMAH TABATABA'I. AYENEH MAREFAT, -(10), 117-140. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/125224/en

Vancouver: Copy

ORVATI MOVAFAGH A.. THE ARGUEMENT OF DEVOTEES FROM IBN SINA TO ALLAMAH TABATABA'I. AYENEH MAREFAT[Internet]. 2007;-(10):117-140. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/125224/en

IEEE: Copy

A. ORVATI MOVAFAGH, “THE ARGUEMENT OF DEVOTEES FROM IBN SINA TO ALLAMAH TABATABA'I,” AYENEH MAREFAT, vol. -, no. 10, pp. 117–140, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/125224/en

Related Journal Papers