EPISTEMIC STATE OF IMAGINATION IN KANT’S CRITIQUE: ASSESSMENT FROM A SADRIAN PERSPECTIVE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SAADATI KHAMSEH ISMAEL

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Ayeneh Ma‘refat Year:2011 | Volume:9 | Issue:28 Page(s): 51-73

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

616

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EPISTEMIC STATE OF IMAGINATION IN KANT’S CRITIQUE: ASSESSMENT FROM A SADRIAN PERSPECTIVE

Author(s)

SAADATI KHAMSEH ISMAEL | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

TRANSCENDENTAL DEDUCTIONQ2

SYNTHESISQ2

KNOWLEDGEQ3

CONSCIOUSNESSQ2

ACQUIRED KNOWLEDGEQ2

Abstract

In the TRANSCENDENTAL DEDUCTION of the critique of the pure reason, Kant emphasizes the importance and function of imagination.Kant, in contrast with Descartes, believed that imagination is one of the essential faculties in the process of threefold transcendental SYNTHESIS. The reproduction SYNTHESIS is the special function of imagination. In the recognition SYNTHESIS, which is to be fulfilled by partnership of understanding and imagination, it is revealed that Kant only recognizes acquired KNOWLEDGE.Yet, using the acquired KNOWLEDGE as a basis, Kant fails to present an acceptable answer to the question that whether this SYNTHESIS is a conscious process or not. Drawing on Mulla Sadra’s views on imagination and KNOWLEDGE, the present article assesses Kant’s views of imagination and the process of SYNTHESIS comparatively.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SAADATI KHAMSEH, ISMAEL. (2011). EPISTEMIC STATE OF IMAGINATION IN KANT’S CRITIQUE: ASSESSMENT FROM A SADRIAN PERSPECTIVE. AYENEH MAREFAT, 9(28), 51-73. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/125236/en

Vancouver: Copy

SAADATI KHAMSEH ISMAEL. EPISTEMIC STATE OF IMAGINATION IN KANT’S CRITIQUE: ASSESSMENT FROM A SADRIAN PERSPECTIVE. AYENEH MAREFAT[Internet]. 2011;9(28):51-73. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/125236/en

IEEE: Copy

ISMAEL SAADATI KHAMSEH, “EPISTEMIC STATE OF IMAGINATION IN KANT’S CRITIQUE: ASSESSMENT FROM A SADRIAN PERSPECTIVE,” AYENEH MAREFAT, vol. 9, no. 28, pp. 51–73, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/125236/en

Related Journal Papers