REVISITING THE LOGICAL PROBLEM OF EVIL AND SWINBURNE’S GREATER GOODS THEODICY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KOUHI GIGLOU TAVAKKOL; DANESH JAVAD

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT) Year:2015 | Volume:13 | Issue:1 (25) Page(s): 149-164

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

670

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

REVISITING THE LOGICAL PROBLEM OF EVIL AND SWINBURNE’S GREATER GOODS THEODICY

Author(s)

KOUHI GIGLOU TAVAKKOL | DANESH JAVAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

LOGICAL PROBLEM OF EVILQ2

ADJUNCTIVE PROPOSITIONQ2

THE PRINCIPLE OF CREDULITYQ2

GREATER GOODSQ2

Abstract

The problem of evil is challenging the belief in the omniscient, omnipotent, and wholly good God. In its logical sense and deductive form, it claims that there are some pointless evils and myriads of lifedisorderliness with the existence of which God’s existence and his positive attributions are inconsistent. Needless to say, the reliability of this argument is based on the trueness or at least probable trueness of the concrete statement. Nevertheless, some philosophers like Swinburne have tried to deny the statement by the answers such as GREATER GOODS theodicy. This article tries to look closely at atheists' logical argument and their alleged concrete statements, and then examine the Swinburne’s defense and its difficulties.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KOUHI GIGLOU, TAVAKKOL, & DANESH, JAVAD. (2015). REVISITING THE LOGICAL PROBLEM OF EVIL AND SWINBURNE’S GREATER GOODS THEODICY. PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT), 13(1 (25) ), 149-164. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/125698/en

Vancouver: Copy

KOUHI GIGLOU TAVAKKOL, DANESH JAVAD. REVISITING THE LOGICAL PROBLEM OF EVIL AND SWINBURNE’S GREATER GOODS THEODICY. PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT)[Internet]. 2015;13(1 (25) ):149-164. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/125698/en

IEEE: Copy

TAVAKKOL KOUHI GIGLOU, and JAVAD DANESH, “REVISITING THE LOGICAL PROBLEM OF EVIL AND SWINBURNE’S GREATER GOODS THEODICY,” PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT), vol. 13, no. 1 (25) , pp. 149–164, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/125698/en

Related Journal Papers