RATIONALITY OF RELIGIOUS FAITH, A COMPARISON BETWEEN GHAZALI AND KIERKEGAARD’S APPROACH

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

POOSTINI KHALIL; ALIZADEH BUIOK

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT) Year:2011 | Volume:8 | Issue:2 (16) Page(s): 5-30

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

936

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

RATIONALITY OF RELIGIOUS FAITH, A COMPARISON BETWEEN GHAZALI AND KIERKEGAARD’S APPROACH

Author(s)

POOSTINI KHALIL | ALIZADEH BUIOK | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

REASONQ2

FAITHQ2

RATIONALITY OF FAITHQ3

GHAZALIQ2

KIERKEGAARDQ2

Abstract

Ghazali and KIERKEGAARD can be compared in their critical attitude toward common interpretation of religion and specially toward problem of rationality of religion. KIERKEGAARD’s disagreement with philosophical system and particularly with Hegelion system is well-known. His concern was directed to negative effect of those system to understanding of religion. Confronting the problem of REASON and FAITH, he held on FAITH and this with basing on his existential foundation particularly on identity of truth and subjectivity.He can be considered as a radical fideist because he take a negative stand against objective study of religion. according to him this kind of religious survey is useless and even dangerous for religion.But GHAZALI’s approach to problem of REASON and FAITH roughly has correspondence with theories of justification. sometimes and even in mystical realm, he adheres rationalism and sometimes he is so fideist that the mere assertoric belief. In FAITH can be accepted.This variety in expression and argument refers to his doctrine about the differences between men. Accordingly they have differen capacities in gaining FAITH and religious belief and thus rationality of FAITH differs according to each one.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

POOSTINI, KHALIL, & ALIZADEH, BUIOK. (2011). RATIONALITY OF RELIGIOUS FAITH, A COMPARISON BETWEEN GHAZALI AND KIERKEGAARD’S APPROACH. PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT), 8(2 (16)), 5-30. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/125759/en

Vancouver: Copy

POOSTINI KHALIL, ALIZADEH BUIOK. RATIONALITY OF RELIGIOUS FAITH, A COMPARISON BETWEEN GHAZALI AND KIERKEGAARD’S APPROACH. PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT)[Internet]. 2011;8(2 (16)):5-30. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/125759/en

IEEE: Copy

KHALIL POOSTINI, and BUIOK ALIZADEH, “RATIONALITY OF RELIGIOUS FAITH, A COMPARISON BETWEEN GHAZALI AND KIERKEGAARD’S APPROACH,” PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT), vol. 8, no. 2 (16), pp. 5–30, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/125759/en

Related Journal Papers