PREEXISTENCE DIVINE KNOWLEDGE OF OBJECTS: THE PRIORITY OF THE THEORY OF “KNOWLEDGE WITHOUT OBJECT OF KNOWING” OVER THE THEORY OF “CONCISE KNOWLEDGE ALONG WITH DETAILED DISCOVERY”

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOEEINODDINI NAEEIME; NASIRI ALIAKBAR

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT) Year:2014 | Volume:12 | Issue:1 (23) Page(s): 165-188

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

767

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

PREEXISTENCE DIVINE KNOWLEDGE OF OBJECTS: THE PRIORITY OF THE THEORY OF “KNOWLEDGE WITHOUT OBJECT OF KNOWING” OVER THE THEORY OF “CONCISE KNOWLEDGE ALONG WITH DETAILED DISCOVERY”

Author(s)

MOEEINODDINI NAEEIME | NASIRI ALIAKBAR | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

DIVINE KNOWLEDGEQ2

ACQUIRED KNOWLEDGEQ2

PRESENTIAL KNOWLEDGEQ2

KNOWLEDGE WITHOUT OBJECTQ2

ISLAMIC HADITHSQ2

MULLA SADRAQ2

Abstract

Mulla Sadra sees knowledge as a real relational attribute and, based on the principle of congruity, by recognizing the meaning of human knowledge and purifying it from its shortcomings, he ascribes the very meaning of human knowledge to God. It means that DIVINE KNOWLEDGE as well as human one is a relational attribute and thus, it calls for an object of knowledge; but the difference is that DIVINE KNOWLEDGE rejects any kind of imperfection. Given this assertion and a couple of rules such as "the simple in nature is all things", and “The union between the intellect and the intelligible”, he presented his view on DIVINE KNOWLEDGE by the theory of “concise knowledge along with detailed discovery”. This theory has encountered many drawbacks, including: relationality of the knowledge; lack of explanation for DIVINE KNOWLEDGE of nonbeings and impossible states of affairs and His Knowledge of details before creating creatures in detailed fashion; acceptance of the union of the knower and the known based on the PRESENTIAL KNOWLEDGE; believing God to being all things; division of God’s essence into two stages of brief and detailed. In contrast, in “Islamic Hadiths”, the theory of “knowledge without object of knowing” has been proposed. The priority of this theory pertains to rejecting the idea that knowledge is always relational. An important consequence of this view is that knowledge will not necessarily have an object of knowing. This idea could have a vast influence on the debate on DIVINE KNOWLEDGE.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MOEEINODDINI, NAEEIME, & NASIRI, ALIAKBAR. (2014). PREEXISTENCE DIVINE KNOWLEDGE OF OBJECTS: THE PRIORITY OF THE THEORY OF “KNOWLEDGE WITHOUT OBJECT OF KNOWING” OVER THE THEORY OF “CONCISE KNOWLEDGE ALONG WITH DETAILED DISCOVERY”. PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT), 12(1 (23) ), 165-188. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/125775/en

Vancouver: Copy

MOEEINODDINI NAEEIME, NASIRI ALIAKBAR. PREEXISTENCE DIVINE KNOWLEDGE OF OBJECTS: THE PRIORITY OF THE THEORY OF “KNOWLEDGE WITHOUT OBJECT OF KNOWING” OVER THE THEORY OF “CONCISE KNOWLEDGE ALONG WITH DETAILED DISCOVERY”. PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT)[Internet]. 2014;12(1 (23) ):165-188. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/125775/en

IEEE: Copy

NAEEIME MOEEINODDINI, and ALIAKBAR NASIRI, “PREEXISTENCE DIVINE KNOWLEDGE OF OBJECTS: THE PRIORITY OF THE THEORY OF “KNOWLEDGE WITHOUT OBJECT OF KNOWING” OVER THE THEORY OF “CONCISE KNOWLEDGE ALONG WITH DETAILED DISCOVERY”,” PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION RESEARCH (NAMAH-I HIKMAT), vol. 12, no. 1 (23) , pp. 165–188, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/125775/en

Related Journal Papers