مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

793
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

METHODOLOGICAL LEVELS OF ABDUCTIVE LOGIC AND IT'S APPLICATION IN ANALYZING KNOWLEDGE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS

Pages

  603-630

Abstract

 This paper distinguishes between “methodology” and “method” and discusses METHODological levels of ABDUCTIVE LOGIC as related to the KNOWLEDGE CLASSIFICATION systems. The purpose is to clarify the application of ABDUCTIVE LOGIC for analyzing KNOWLEDGE CLASSIFICATION systems as an alternative for mainstream logics in the field, i.e. inductive and DEDUCTIVE LOGIC. METHODology used in this paper is conceptual analysis. ABDUCTIVE LOGIC approaches reality as a social construction. It is obviously an interpretative and constructivist approach. Therefore, its aim is to understand the social phenomena that socially constructed by social agents. Therefore, any given KNOWLEDGE CLASSIFICATION system is a socially constructed phenomenon reflecting subjective biases and prejudices of its creators. KNOWLEDGE CLASSIFICATION systems aren’t innocent objective systems. They are systems that are determined and restricted by cultural and social forces operating as their conditions of production. Every classification system has some kind of ontological and epistemological commitment. Therefore, we should recognize “alternative” classification systems based on “alternative” ontological and epistemological commitments, as legitimate as current mainstream classification systems. The paper introduces METHODological levels of ABDUCTIVE LOGIC and provides LIS professionals with a new and alternative way for analyzing KNOWLEDGE CLASSIFICATION systems as interpretative and semantic social constructions.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    KHANDAN, MOHAMMAD, FADAEI, GHOLAMREZA, & VASFI, MOHAMMAD REZA. (2015). METHODOLOGICAL LEVELS OF ABDUCTIVE LOGIC AND IT'S APPLICATION IN ANALYZING KNOWLEDGE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT (INFORMATION SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY), 30(3), 603-630. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/131039/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    KHANDAN MOHAMMAD, FADAEI GHOLAMREZA, VASFI MOHAMMAD REZA. METHODOLOGICAL LEVELS OF ABDUCTIVE LOGIC AND IT'S APPLICATION IN ANALYZING KNOWLEDGE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT (INFORMATION SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY)[Internet]. 2015;30(3):603-630. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/131039/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MOHAMMAD KHANDAN, GHOLAMREZA FADAEI, and MOHAMMAD REZA VASFI, “METHODOLOGICAL LEVELS OF ABDUCTIVE LOGIC AND IT'S APPLICATION IN ANALYZING KNOWLEDGE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT (INFORMATION SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY), vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 603–630, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/131039/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button