A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE PROS AND CONS’ ARGUMENTS OF THE RULE OF GRACE IN THEOLOGICAL DISCUSSIONS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KARIMI HAMID

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI Year:2015 | Volume:11 | Issue:42 Page(s): 67-80

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

827

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE PROS AND CONS’ ARGUMENTS OF THE RULE OF GRACE IN THEOLOGICAL DISCUSSIONS

Author(s)

KARIMI HAMID | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

GRACEQ2

THE RULE OF GRACEQ2

THE BESTQ2

THE ACHIEVED FAVORQ2

PROXIMATE GRACEQ2

NECESSITY OF APPOINTING IMAMQ2

NECESSITY OF DUTYQ2

Abstract

One of the important rules of Adlieh theology is the rule of GRACE based on which it is pointed at the necessity of GRACE of God in various issues. By defining the term GRACE, its conditions and types as the beginning of the discussion and reviewing the arguments of the pros i.e. the majority of the Imamiyeh and Mu’tazilah theologians, it will be clear that they are incomplete. Also, by evaluating the arguments of the cons like Beshr Ibn Mo’tamer and Shareh Maqased, while some are disputed, some others are confirmed. According to reason, God is wise and the requirement of wisdom is necessary for Him but in terms of major antecedent, GRACE is not necessary because it includes infinite assumptions not being realized externally but it can be realized. On the other hand, in terms of minor antecedent, the total of advantages and disadvantages of a certain action can be recognized so that in the following it can be decreed whether it is necessary for God or not. For all problems in which Shiite scholars have relied upon this rule (necessity of religious duties, sending prophets, the prophets’ infallibility, necessity of promise, NECESSITY OF APPOINTING IMAMs) there are substitute arguments.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KARIMI, HAMID. (2015). A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE PROS AND CONS’ ARGUMENTS OF THE RULE OF GRACE IN THEOLOGICAL DISCUSSIONS. ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI, 11(42), 67-80. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/133415/en

Vancouver: Copy

KARIMI HAMID. A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE PROS AND CONS’ ARGUMENTS OF THE RULE OF GRACE IN THEOLOGICAL DISCUSSIONS. ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI[Internet]. 2015;11(42):67-80. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/133415/en

IEEE: Copy

HAMID KARIMI, “A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE PROS AND CONS’ ARGUMENTS OF THE RULE OF GRACE IN THEOLOGICAL DISCUSSIONS,” ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI, vol. 11, no. 42, pp. 67–80, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/133415/en

Related Journal Papers