ANALYZING AND CRITICIZING THE PROOFS OF LAWFULLY ADMISSIBILITY OF BACKBITING RELIGIOUS OPPONENTS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOHAMMADIAN ALI; ELMI SOLA MOHAMMADREZA; FAKHLAEI MOHAMMAD TAGHI

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE RESEARCHES Year:2016 | Volume:12 | Issue:42 Page(s): 147-168

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

939

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

ANALYZING AND CRITICIZING THE PROOFS OF LAWFULLY ADMISSIBILITY OF BACKBITING RELIGIOUS OPPONENTS

Author(s)

MOHAMMADIAN ALI | ELMI SOLA MOHAMMADREZA | FAKHLAEI MOHAMMAD TAGHI | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

BACKBITINGQ2

BELIEVERQ2

OPPONENTQ2

ISLAMQ2

FAITHQ2

Abstract

Among the challenges of our modern time which have occupied the many religious people's mind, the amount of veneration and respect of the holy Canon of ISLAM to religious OPPONENTs is important. The cause of appearance of such questions is issuance of some rare Fatwas in this domain which are sometimes invigorated by the support of majority of the jurisprudents. One of these challenging Fatwas which can be seen in many jurisprudential books is the one that permits BACKBITING religious OPPONENTs. Majority of jurisprudents has considered "being a BELIEVER" as the criterion of prohibition of BACKBITING. The writer has concluded that the presented proofs for the mentioned Fatwa are not sufficient for proving the claim. The writer believes it is not canonically valid to consider "being a BELIEVER" as a provision in the victim for prohibition of BACKBITING. This point of view is against the view of the majority though, but some of recent scholars have approved it. Furthermore, this viewpoint is compatible with the wide contextual meaning of the main proofs of this jurisprudential domain and the primary maxims of the prohibition of the BACKBITING.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MOHAMMADIAN, ALI, ELMI SOLA, MOHAMMADREZA, & FAKHLAEI, MOHAMMAD TAGHI. (2016). ANALYZING AND CRITICIZING THE PROOFS OF LAWFULLY ADMISSIBILITY OF BACKBITING RELIGIOUS OPPONENTS. JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE RESEARCHES, 12(42), 147-168. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/134190/en

Vancouver: Copy

MOHAMMADIAN ALI, ELMI SOLA MOHAMMADREZA, FAKHLAEI MOHAMMAD TAGHI. ANALYZING AND CRITICIZING THE PROOFS OF LAWFULLY ADMISSIBILITY OF BACKBITING RELIGIOUS OPPONENTS. JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE RESEARCHES[Internet]. 2016;12(42):147-168. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/134190/en

IEEE: Copy

ALI MOHAMMADIAN, MOHAMMADREZA ELMI SOLA, and MOHAMMAD TAGHI FAKHLAEI, “ANALYZING AND CRITICIZING THE PROOFS OF LAWFULLY ADMISSIBILITY OF BACKBITING RELIGIOUS OPPONENTS,” JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE RESEARCHES, vol. 12, no. 42, pp. 147–168, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/134190/en

Related Journal Papers