STUDYING WHY THE REPENTANCE OF MALE FORNICATOR IS GIVEN NO LESSER PUNISHMENT, AFTER QIYAM BAYYINAH (A CRITICISM ON ARTICLE 114 OF THE ISLAMIC PENAL CODE)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HOSSEINNEZHAD SEYYED MOJTABA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE RESEARCHES Year:2018 | Volume:14 | Issue:51 Page(s): 53-76

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

944

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

STUDYING WHY THE REPENTANCE OF MALE FORNICATOR IS GIVEN NO LESSER PUNISHMENT, AFTER QIYAM BAYYINAH (A CRITICISM ON ARTICLE 114 OF THE ISLAMIC PENAL CODE)

Author(s)

HOSSEINNEZHAD SEYYED MOJTABA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

HADD PUNISHMENTQ1

REPENTANCEQ1

MALE FORNICATORQ1

BAYYENEHQ2

REPUTATIONQ1

AUTHENTIC SOURCEQ1

Abstract

Based on the verdict of whether or not to accept the REPENTANCE of MALE FORNICATOR after Qiyam Bayyinah, there is a disagreement between jurists. Although some jurists such as Sheikh Sadooq and Sheikh Mofid believe that the REPENTANCE of MALE FORNICATOR makes him deserving of lesser punishment, most of them are in an agreement that it cannot conducive to commutate the punishment. This was outlined by Article 114 of the Islamic Penal Code. Taking into account all these comments as well as examining them, the authors arrive at the conclusion that even though there are many narrations. No reference or documentary value specified to prove that the REPENTANCE of MALE FORNICATOR makes him undeserving of lesser punishment. It is due to some evidence including the Istishab principle and the HADD PUNISHMENT etc, according to believers’ claim of first quote. There is also some weak evidence to believers’ claim of second quote including the lack of documentary evidence and relying on Tuaf al-uqūl narrative. Thus, the important thing is to investigate if the REPUTATION evidence is reliable. After reviewing the documentations, it becomes clear that the believers’ claims of first quotes provide no proof of eligibility to be ascribed to. None of the believers’ claims of second quotes, on the other hand, are veracious except those of Tuaf al-uqūl narratives. Neither the believers’ claims of first quotes nor the believers’ claims of second quotes, except those of Tuaf al-uqūl narratives, are veracious enough to be ascribed to. However, the believers’ claims of second quotes are thoroughly complete concerning the Tuaf al-uqūl narratives. There is no problem with investigating the documentations. Confirming the authenticity of this document as being thoroughly complete according to the believers’ claims of second quotes, there is no doubt to accept the second quote in this regard.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HOSSEINNEZHAD, SEYYED MOJTABA. (2018). STUDYING WHY THE REPENTANCE OF MALE FORNICATOR IS GIVEN NO LESSER PUNISHMENT, AFTER QIYAM BAYYINAH (A CRITICISM ON ARTICLE 114 OF THE ISLAMIC PENAL CODE). JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE RESEARCHES, 14(51 ), 53-76. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/134374/en

Vancouver: Copy

HOSSEINNEZHAD SEYYED MOJTABA. STUDYING WHY THE REPENTANCE OF MALE FORNICATOR IS GIVEN NO LESSER PUNISHMENT, AFTER QIYAM BAYYINAH (A CRITICISM ON ARTICLE 114 OF THE ISLAMIC PENAL CODE). JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE RESEARCHES[Internet]. 2018;14(51 ):53-76. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/134374/en

IEEE: Copy

SEYYED MOJTABA HOSSEINNEZHAD, “STUDYING WHY THE REPENTANCE OF MALE FORNICATOR IS GIVEN NO LESSER PUNISHMENT, AFTER QIYAM BAYYINAH (A CRITICISM ON ARTICLE 114 OF THE ISLAMIC PENAL CODE),” JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE RESEARCHES, vol. 14, no. 51 , pp. 53–76, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/134374/en

Related Journal Papers