COMPARISON OF AUTHORITARIAN GOVERNMENT AND THE RELATIONSHIP OF PEOPLE WITH GOVERNMENT IN GHAZALI AND HOBBES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

TAVANA MOHAMMAD ALI; AZARKAMAND FARZAD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Research in Theoretical Politics Year:2015 | Volume:NEW | Issue:17 Page(s): 49-76

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,265

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF AUTHORITARIAN GOVERNMENT AND THE RELATIONSHIP OF PEOPLE WITH GOVERNMENT IN GHAZALI AND HOBBES

Author(s)

TAVANA MOHAMMAD ALI | AZARKAMAND FARZAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

POLITICAL THOUGHTQ2

POWERFUL GOVERNMENTQ2

ISOLATION OF PEOPLEQ2

MOHAMMAD- GHAZALIQ2

THOMAS HOBBESQ2

Abstract

This article studies the basics of forming POWERFUL GOVERNMENT and the relationship between people with government in Ghazali and Hobbes thought. Special view of both of the thinkers to nature of human is intellectual foundation of forming authoritative government. According to the four human traits, Ghazali tries to educate the divine human that acts passively under divine governance. Since religion and politics don’t separate from each other in Ghazali’s view, so in government, divinity of these traits joins to politics and POWERFUL GOVERNMENT. But Hobbes believed that human have power demand and warrior nature in addition, in primary and natural human condition, the war has been going on against each other. And human try to rescue themselves according to their wisdom. So, they established an authoritative government with their foresight. Therefore, the subject of both of them is largely same, but their processing is different. It means that both of these intellectuals lived in restless period, and the necessity of security causes them to resort to authoritative government. On the other hand, both of these intellectuals assign passive roles for people; however, Ghazali’s argumentation method is canonical and Hobbes’s method is rational. Moreover it seems that the rational theory of Hobbes - accepting the possibility of insurgence-paves the way for going beyond the authoritative government, although the canonical theory of Hobbes leads to one type of reproduction of authoritative government.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

TAVANA, MOHAMMAD ALI, & AZARKAMAND, FARZAD. (2015). COMPARISON OF AUTHORITARIAN GOVERNMENT AND THE RELATIONSHIP OF PEOPLE WITH GOVERNMENT IN GHAZALI AND HOBBES. PIZHUHISH-I SIYASAT-I NAZARI: RESEARCH IN POLITICAL SCIENCE, NEW(17), 49-76. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/136045/en

Vancouver: Copy

TAVANA MOHAMMAD ALI, AZARKAMAND FARZAD. COMPARISON OF AUTHORITARIAN GOVERNMENT AND THE RELATIONSHIP OF PEOPLE WITH GOVERNMENT IN GHAZALI AND HOBBES. PIZHUHISH-I SIYASAT-I NAZARI: RESEARCH IN POLITICAL SCIENCE[Internet]. 2015;NEW(17):49-76. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/136045/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD ALI TAVANA, and FARZAD AZARKAMAND, “COMPARISON OF AUTHORITARIAN GOVERNMENT AND THE RELATIONSHIP OF PEOPLE WITH GOVERNMENT IN GHAZALI AND HOBBES,” PIZHUHISH-I SIYASAT-I NAZARI: RESEARCH IN POLITICAL SCIENCE, vol. NEW, no. 17, pp. 49–76, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/136045/en

Related Journal Papers