مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,216
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EQUIVALENCE SYLLOGISM AND THE LOGIC OF RELATIONS

Pages

  35-64

Abstract

 Muslim ligicians faced with problems in justifying certain simple reasonings (Such as equivalence syllogism) and these problems were rooted in their commitment to categorical syllogism. In this regard weakness of early logic has nothing to do with relation as such that is, it is not such that early logic was unable to prove those reasoning which contained relation due to possessing relation. On the contrary, their main problem was that they relied on the analyses of propositions in terms of subject and predicate and focusing their attention to categorical syllogism. That is, in any reasoning subject predicate and middle term should be ascertained and evidently such process is not possible every where.Therefore, equivalence syllogism reveals a defect in Aristotelian system of subject predicate - relation. For, on the one hand, Aristotelian version of syllogism requires that the premises of syllogism should be analysed into terms and each term in modern logic term is a single positional predicate. While equivalence syllogism is formed of certain premises that involve relation or categorical section of multi - position predicates. Hence referring equivalence syllogism to the conjugate syllogism is not devoid of objection.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    JAFARI, A.A.. (2005). EQUIVALENCE SYLLOGISM AND THE LOGIC OF RELATIONS. MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA, 38(77 (2)), 35-64. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/13673/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    JAFARI A.A.. EQUIVALENCE SYLLOGISM AND THE LOGIC OF RELATIONS. MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA[Internet]. 2005;38(77 (2)):35-64. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/13673/en

    IEEE: Copy

    A.A. JAFARI, “EQUIVALENCE SYLLOGISM AND THE LOGIC OF RELATIONS,” MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA, vol. 38, no. 77 (2), pp. 35–64, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/13673/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button