THE COMPARISON OF THE SURVEILLANCE'S RIGHTS IN THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURES OF IRAN AND THE U.S.A

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KOOSHKI GHOLAM HASAN; SOHEIL MOGHADDAM SAHAR

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: THE JUDICIARY’S LAW JOURNAL Year:2016 | Volume:80 | Issue:94 Page(s): 185-215

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,910

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE COMPARISON OF THE SURVEILLANCE'S RIGHTS IN THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURES OF IRAN AND THE U.S.A

Author(s)

KOOSHKI GHOLAM HASAN | SOHEIL MOGHADDAM SAHAR | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CRIMINAL PROCEDUREQ1

CRIME DETECTIONQ1

SURVEILLANCE RIGHTSQ2

IRANIAN AND AMERICAN LAWQ1

Abstract

Support of the individual rights and freedom is one of the purposes of criminal procedural rules. Police detention or surveillance is contrary to the individual rights. In accordance with obvious rules, police at both American and Iranian systems of justice might arrest someone. This matter has an exceptional aspect. It is essential to observe two provisions in which include “visible crime” and “the principle of necessity”. A warrant is issued by judicial authorities to arrest someone is a requirement under American rules and it is possible to arrest someone at visible crime. Legislator of both legal systems has been considering rights like having promptly access to a lawyer since this proceeding to the presumption of innocence. Nevertheless, the accused has a right to be silent until a lawyer comes under American system of justice. On the other hand, fair and just interrogation such as realization of the accusation and its evidences to secure accused’ rights is predicted by both legal systems. In line with American rules, the realization of the arrest and predicting electronic devices to record accused’ statements is considered. Moreover, appropriate sanctions like exclusionary rule beside other sanctions at this legal system is predicted. Anyway, considering the regularity of the arrest and detention at this stage, both legal systems have put their efforts into reinforcing the accused’ rights.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KOOSHKI, GHOLAM HASAN, & SOHEIL MOGHADDAM, SAHAR. (2016). THE COMPARISON OF THE SURVEILLANCE'S RIGHTS IN THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURES OF IRAN AND THE U.S.A. THE JUDICIARY’S LAW JOURNAL, 80(94), 185-215. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/137963/en

Vancouver: Copy

KOOSHKI GHOLAM HASAN, SOHEIL MOGHADDAM SAHAR. THE COMPARISON OF THE SURVEILLANCE'S RIGHTS IN THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURES OF IRAN AND THE U.S.A. THE JUDICIARY’S LAW JOURNAL[Internet]. 2016;80(94):185-215. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/137963/en

IEEE: Copy

GHOLAM HASAN KOOSHKI, and SAHAR SOHEIL MOGHADDAM, “THE COMPARISON OF THE SURVEILLANCE'S RIGHTS IN THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURES OF IRAN AND THE U.S.A,” THE JUDICIARY’S LAW JOURNAL, vol. 80, no. 94, pp. 185–215, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/137963/en

Related Journal Papers