An Evaluation of al-Kāfī Commentators on the Ontology of the Intellect in Terms of Compatibility or Incompatibility with Hadiths: Assessing the Independent Approach to the Intellect

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Nosrati Shaban

Educational Videos and Scientific Workshops

Scientific Information Database

ISSN: 2588-4824

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: NAQD VA NAZAR Year:2024 | Volume: | Issue: Page(s): 67-98

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

An Evaluation of al-Kāfī Commentators on the Ontology of the Intellect in Terms of Compatibility or Incompatibility with Hadiths: Assessing the Independent Approach to the Intellect

Author(s)

Nosrati Shaban | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Kafi commentatorsQ4

intellect in hadithsQ4

IntellectQ4

abstinence of intellectQ4

contradictory intellectQ4

Abstract

The interpretation of the existence of reason as an entity independent of human existence is based on continuous narratives and rational arguments that are divided into two theories. This research evaluates these two theories with a descriptive analytical method. The theory of "intellect as the first creature" is based on the rational-philosophical argument and is inconsistent with the results of the textual analysis of the traditions in "the compatibility of the first creature with reason" and "its non-belonging to the field of human life". The analysis of "paradoxical essence similar to active Intellect" has tried to provide a rational explanation of the theory and is more compatible with traditions, therefore in "acceptance of independent existence", "unity in the same multiplicity", "acceptance of movement and interaction", "separation from human identity" At the same time as belonging to the human sphere, the "relationship of enlightenment with the speaking soul" is compatible with the traditions, but since the explanation of the theory uses rational-philosophical foundations, it believes in the existence of "suspiciousness", "the influence of reason on the levels of the speaking soul", "how Multiplicity of minds" is incompatible with traditions

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops

Download

Move to top

وبگردی