مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,243
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

LOGICAL STRUCTURE OF PROBLEMS AND SUBJECT OF SCIENCE ACCORDING TO ARISTOTLE, FARABI, IBN SINA AND IBN RUSHD

Pages

  87-105

Abstract

 Philosophers regard the PROBLEMS OF SCIENCE as ESSENTIAL ACCIDENTS of the SUBJECT OF SCIENCE and they call a predicate which a subject derived at the level of it and a predicate which is joined to it by essence and substance of a subject joined to it essential accident. Although the basis of this remark is taken from Aristotle, but philosophers such as Farabi and Ibn Sina have propounded new topics about the relation of the SUBJECT OF SCIENCE with the subject of a problem which can not be seen in Aristotle’s works. Since the predicates of problems are the ESSENTIAL ACCIDENTS of SUBJECT OF SCIENCE, the SUBJECT OF SCIENCE should be derived at the level of predicates of PROBLEMS OF SCIENCE. But application the rule of ESSENTIAL ACCIDENTS to all the PROBLEMS OF SCIENCE is not without its difficulties. To solve this problem the concept of essential accident has been developed by Farabi and Ibn Sina with different elaborations and thereby the subjects of the problems besides the science includes matters such as kind of the SUBJECT OF SCIENCE, subdivision of kinds of the SUBJECT OF SCIENCE and ESSENTIAL ACCIDENTS of the SUBJECT OF SCIENCE as well. Sheikh al- Rais for identifying the boundaries of this development has set forth the standard of specification and mediation in predication. Ibn Rushd in his commentary and compendia of Aristotle’s works has paid no attention to innovations of Farabi and Ibn Sina and has no a consistent remarks in these matters.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    MAFTOUNI, NADIA. (2010). LOGICAL STRUCTURE OF PROBLEMS AND SUBJECT OF SCIENCE ACCORDING TO ARISTOTLE, FARABI, IBN SINA AND IBN RUSHD. AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL, 14(43), 87-105. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/145564/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MAFTOUNI NADIA. LOGICAL STRUCTURE OF PROBLEMS AND SUBJECT OF SCIENCE ACCORDING TO ARISTOTLE, FARABI, IBN SINA AND IBN RUSHD. AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL[Internet]. 2010;14(43):87-105. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/145564/en

    IEEE: Copy

    NADIA MAFTOUNI, “LOGICAL STRUCTURE OF PROBLEMS AND SUBJECT OF SCIENCE ACCORDING TO ARISTOTLE, FARABI, IBN SINA AND IBN RUSHD,” AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL, vol. 14, no. 43, pp. 87–105, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/145564/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button