An Investigation on the Argument of Allameh Dawani in Proving the Necessary Being and its Comparison with Avicennian Seddiqin argument

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Ahesteh Mahmood

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Avicennian Philosophy Journal Year:2019 | Volume:22 | Issue:60 Page(s): 121-133

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

581

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

An Investigation on the Argument of Allameh Dawani in Proving the Necessary Being and its Comparison with Avicennian Seddiqin argument

Author(s)

Ahesteh Mahmood | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Ibn SinaQ1

DawaniQ2

Seddiqin argument (proof of the righteous)Q2

the Necessary BeingQ2

Possible beingQ2

Abstract

Ibn Sina Seddiqin argument (proof of the righteous) is one of the important arguments in proving the Necessary Being that, along with Ibn Sina's expositions, The later philosophers have quoted or criticized it; among the philosophers who have carefully considered the argument and presented a specific explanation, is Allameh Dawani. He also names his argument in proving the Necessary Being, the same as Ibn Sina Seddiqin argument, but states the principle in a way that differentiates it from other explanations. According to his argument, which he considers to be the strongest and most reliable way of proving the Necessary Being, he has conceived the Possible beings as series Cause and effect, if there is no Necessary Being, none of them can be realized and as a result, they can be annihilated. Thus, this article aims to explain, analyze and criticize Dawani's view and compare it with Avicennian proof.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Ahesteh, Mahmood. (2019). An Investigation on the Argument of Allameh Dawani in Proving the Necessary Being and its Comparison with Avicennian Seddiqin argument. AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL, 22(60 ), 121-133. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/145648/en

Vancouver: Copy

Ahesteh Mahmood. An Investigation on the Argument of Allameh Dawani in Proving the Necessary Being and its Comparison with Avicennian Seddiqin argument. AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL[Internet]. 2019;22(60 ):121-133. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/145648/en

IEEE: Copy

Mahmood Ahesteh, “An Investigation on the Argument of Allameh Dawani in Proving the Necessary Being and its Comparison with Avicennian Seddiqin argument,” AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL, vol. 22, no. 60 , pp. 121–133, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/145648/en

Related Journal Papers