INTRODUCING CONCEPTUAL LIMIT AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT MODAL BY ABOLBARAKT AND ANALYZING AVICCENA THOUGHTS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ZAKIANY GHOLAMREZA; ASADI HOSSEIN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Avicennian Philosophy Journal Year:2018 | Volume:22 | Issue:59 Page(s): 61-74

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

484

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

INTRODUCING CONCEPTUAL LIMIT AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT MODAL BY ABOLBARAKT AND ANALYZING AVICCENA THOUGHTS

Author(s)

ZAKIANY GHOLAMREZA | ASADI HOSSEIN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CONCEPTUAL LIMITQ1

ABOLBARAKATQ1

AVICENNAQ2

ACKNOWLEDGMENT MODALQ2

MODAL OF PROPOSITIONQ1

Abstract

Abolbarakt was a great thinker who has critical sight on AVICENNA. In this article, we try to mark him as a mind theoretician and we will give two evidences which can be considered as his innovations. One is CONCEPTUAL LIMIT (Hadde-Mafhumi) as an alternative for true limit, and the second is ACKNOWLEDGMENT MODAL instead of MODAL OF PROPOSITION. Then we analyze these thoughts and show how they are presented in subsequent logical texts. The theory of CONCEPTUAL LIMIT as an alternative for true limit (Hadde-Haghighi) is a consequence of our method of naming objects. That is, objects is named according to our knowledge with respect to them, so instead of knowing objects, it may be adequate to know limits of our knowledge and what we recognize from objects. Besides, by accepting acknowledgement modal instead of MODAL OF PROPOSITION, we encounter with a new concept in modal logic. However, this theory is not useful, since the introduction of deduction is evident. We note that both theories exist in the heart of AVICENNA’ s thoughts, but Abolbarakt use them in the other places.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ZAKIANY, GHOLAMREZA, & ASADI, HOSSEIN. (2018). INTRODUCING CONCEPTUAL LIMIT AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT MODAL BY ABOLBARAKT AND ANALYZING AVICCENA THOUGHTS. AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL, 22(59 ), 61-74. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/145654/en

Vancouver: Copy

ZAKIANY GHOLAMREZA, ASADI HOSSEIN. INTRODUCING CONCEPTUAL LIMIT AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT MODAL BY ABOLBARAKT AND ANALYZING AVICCENA THOUGHTS. AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL[Internet]. 2018;22(59 ):61-74. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/145654/en

IEEE: Copy

GHOLAMREZA ZAKIANY, and HOSSEIN ASADI, “INTRODUCING CONCEPTUAL LIMIT AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT MODAL BY ABOLBARAKT AND ANALYZING AVICCENA THOUGHTS,” AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL, vol. 22, no. 59 , pp. 61–74, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/145654/en

Related Journal Papers