STATUS OF METHOD IN SCIENCE, A REFLECTION ON THE NATURE OF SCIENCE IN MODERN CULTURE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SOUZANCHI H.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: STRATEGY FOR CULTURE Year:2009 | Volume:1 | Issue:4 Page(s): 79-98

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,680

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

STATUS OF METHOD IN SCIENCE, A REFLECTION ON THE NATURE OF SCIENCE IN MODERN CULTURE

Author(s)

SOUZANCHI H. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

SCIENCEQ2

EMPIRICISMQ3

METHODQ2

CULTUREQ2

PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCEQ2

SOCIOLOGY OF KNOWLEDGEQ3

Abstract

From renaissance till date, SCIENCE and knowledge have found a new position to the extent that today SCIENCE and experience have become intertwined. A philosophical approach to the nature of developments, which led to this intertwinement, shows that this kind of approach to SCIENCE is harmful. It has not had any precedence in the history of thought and its spread-particularly in our society- has added to the problems in the process of promotion of SCIENCE. The problem is that due to the weakness of philosophy in the middle ages and the problems that surfaced in the field of philosophical thought about the nature of SCIENCE and knowledge from Descartes to Kant, gradually the normative issues were taken out of the field of SCIENCE and knowledge and in the theoretical field experiment became the only means for understanding of the outside reality. The positivists fixed the problem and Popper who was determined to defend the logical and epistemological identity of SCIENCE, maintained that only the knowledge, which is open to experiment, is SCIENCE and classified episteme into scientific and unscientific ones. Hence he unconsciously paved the way for the replacement of SOCIOLOGY OF KNOWLEDGE with the issues related to epistemology of knowledge to the extent that the ensuing philosophers of SCIENCE- who play the role of metaphysical philosophers of modem world-openly submitted scientology to sociology, falling into the bosom of relativism, while neither experiment is the determinant of experimental SCIENCEs nor METHOD can be basically a proper criterion for classification of SCIENCEs. The outlet is first of all return to classification of SCIENCEs on "the basis of subjects not METHOD; secondly subjecting the METHODology of every SCIENCE to the proper understanding of its subject matter; and thirdly retuning the normative issues to the field of SCIENCE and giving the theoretical and practical subjects their due role.

Cites

References

Cite

APA: Copy

SOUZANCHI, H.. (2009). STATUS OF METHOD IN SCIENCE, A REFLECTION ON THE NATURE OF SCIENCE IN MODERN CULTURE. STRATEGY FOR CULTURE, 1(4), 79-98. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/149297/en

Vancouver: Copy

SOUZANCHI H.. STATUS OF METHOD IN SCIENCE, A REFLECTION ON THE NATURE OF SCIENCE IN MODERN CULTURE. STRATEGY FOR CULTURE[Internet]. 2009;1(4):79-98. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/149297/en

IEEE: Copy

H. SOUZANCHI, “STATUS OF METHOD IN SCIENCE, A REFLECTION ON THE NATURE OF SCIENCE IN MODERN CULTURE,” STRATEGY FOR CULTURE, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 79–98, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/149297/en

Related Journal Papers