THE OPPOSITENESS OF MUCH WRITING AND GOOD WRITING IN KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION: A CRITICAL STUDY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ISLAMI ARDAKANI SEYED HASSAN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: STRATEGY FOR CULTURE Year:2014 | Volume:7 | Issue:25 Page(s): 105-128

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

735

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE OPPOSITENESS OF MUCH WRITING AND GOOD WRITING IN KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION: A CRITICAL STUDY

Author(s)

ISLAMI ARDAKANI SEYED HASSAN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

RESEARCH ETHICSQ2

ETHICS OF WRITINGQ2

KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTIONQ2

GOOD WRITINGQ2

WRITING A LOTQ2

Abstract

One of the most famous stereotypes in academic circles is the idea that WRITING A LOT is in sharp contrast to GOOD WRITING. So, to be a good writer, we should avoid writing much. This cliché is so powerful that virtually nobody has tried to challenge it. In this article, the writer has attempted to question this belief and to analyze it critically. To achieve this end, he has articulated and reported five reasons in defense of this idea. Then he has tried to show insufficiency of them. At the end, referring to Lotka's Law, the writer has concluded that WRITING A LOT, but at the same time well-structured and according to all grammatical rules, is the first and prime condition for KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION. In fact, there are mostly a few people who constitute the core of scientific disciplines, who were usually prolific writers and enriched the literature of their subjects through prolific writing, such as Aristotle, Farabi, Avicenna, Aquinas, Walton, and Rescher.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ISLAMI ARDAKANI, SEYED HASSAN. (2014). THE OPPOSITENESS OF MUCH WRITING AND GOOD WRITING IN KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION: A CRITICAL STUDY. STRATEGY FOR CULTURE, 7(25), 105-128. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/149308/en

Vancouver: Copy

ISLAMI ARDAKANI SEYED HASSAN. THE OPPOSITENESS OF MUCH WRITING AND GOOD WRITING IN KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION: A CRITICAL STUDY. STRATEGY FOR CULTURE[Internet]. 2014;7(25):105-128. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/149308/en

IEEE: Copy

SEYED HASSAN ISLAMI ARDAKANI, “THE OPPOSITENESS OF MUCH WRITING AND GOOD WRITING IN KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION: A CRITICAL STUDY,” STRATEGY FOR CULTURE, vol. 7, no. 25, pp. 105–128, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/149308/en

Related Journal Papers