مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

27
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Pathology of criminal policy in issuing Unified Judicial Precedent

Pages

  61-90

Abstract

 In Iran's legal system, binding judicial precedents should be sought in Unified Judicial precedent. Therefore, Unified Judicial precedents are considered as the main sources of Law. Now, if we believe that the precedent is formed due to stability and continuity; Requiring all judicial authorities to follow a certain interpretive opinion that is issued a few months after the approval of the Law cannot be considered a "precedent". Because, in this sense, the Interpretation position of the Supreme Court has been reduced to legislation. Considering the mentioned criticism, present research has tried to analyze the content of fifty-eight Unified Judicial precedents issued between 1392 and the end of 1401 Solar Hijri, while explaining the philosophy and position of the Unified Judicial precedent, classifying the Unified Judicial precedent, and extracting the components Criminal Policy of the Supreme Court of Iran. These components include the lack of regulated methodology in Interpretation, adopting a lenient Criminal Policy and violation of the Law. In addition, the reasons for the large number of Unified Judicial precedents, in the above-mentioned duration, are minimal participation of executive agents in the approval of Laws, dispersion and experimental nature of Laws, and the lack of coherence between legislative and judicial Criminal Policy.

Multimedia

  • No record.
  • Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button