Traditional and rational explanation of

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Haji Hosseini Hossein; Mortazi Ahmad

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Islamic Revolution Research Year:2023 | Volume:12 | Issue:2 Page(s): 157-186

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Traditional and rational explanation of "right to question" from the point of view of government jurisprudence

Author(s)

Haji Hosseini Hossein | Mortazi Ahmad | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Right question

marginal question

lack of right to answer

freedom of speech

Abstract

In Islamic society, according to rational and rational evidence, governors and people have equal rights and duties, each of which must fully accomplish its duties and, on the other hand, exercise their rights in the best way. One of the duties of the people towards the governors is to choose the right one and trust them in the assignment of affairs. In contrast to one of the rights of the people in relation to this trust and choice, the right to question and impeach the assigned duties. In recent years, a two-law plan has been introduced in the legislature, which rejected the question of the authorities with the aim of attracting attention and criminalized it. But according to the present study, this plan and any similar plan have contradicted the narrative and rational arguments contained in the Islamic sources. Incidentally, in Islamic teachings, including verses and narrations, and the syllable of Prophet (PBUH) and Alavi (AS) The emphasis has been on the right of this right. Secondly, the denial of the right to ask and demand from public officials and rulers is in conflict with the principle of "freedom of expression" contained in the Constitution; thirdly, with the human rights standards and the principles of democratic societies, such as the principle of freedom of opinion and freedom of the press, and so on, which Iran is also unanimous. The present study, based on the bibliographic and descriptive-analytical sources, examines the right of question and the fundamental rejection of the twofourth plan and its similar plans and bills based on the jurisprudential doctrines and Islamic law.

Multimedia

No record.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans