DISCIPLINE, INTERDISCIPLINE AND CLASSIFICATION OF KNOWLEDGE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BAHRANI MORTEZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES IN THE HUMANITIES (IRANIAN JOURNAL OF CULTURAL RESEARCH) Year:2013 | Volume:5 | Issue:2 (18) Page(s): 37-59

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,682

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

DISCIPLINE, INTERDISCIPLINE AND CLASSIFICATION OF KNOWLEDGE

Author(s)

BAHRANI MORTEZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

DISCIPLINEQ2

INTERDISCIPLINEQ2

KNOWLEDGE CLASSIFICATIONQ2

CLASSIFICATION CRITERIAQ2

METHODOLOGICALQ3

ONTOLOGICALQ2

Abstract

It seems that the focus and emphasis on DISCIPLINE and interDISCIPLINE in the area of knowledge and episteme has a link to the KNOWLEDGE CLASSIFICATION and social and cultural relations of knowledge. The history of KNOWLEDGE CLASSIFICATION shows that the CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA are either ONTOLOGICAL and moral or METHODOLOGICAL and epistemological. The ONTOLOGICAL basis is on the fact that existence is hierarchical; moral basis also depends on the amount of effectiveness and usefulness of the knowledge in providing the needs of practical life in individual or social dimensions. Contrarily, METHODOLOGICAL basis is formed on the fact that methods for discovering the truth and proving the correct viewpoint are very various. Therefore, method of episteme acquisition in some knowledge is considered different and more complete than others. Similarly, any field of knowledge based on epistemology has emphasized on the truth system. The fact that which criterion should be used for KNOWLEDGE CLASSIFICATION also determines the knowledge owners’ trend towards DISCIPLINE or interDISCIPLINE. Considering this differentiation, “interdisciplinary” in the first instance has been brought up according to the moral and METHODOLOGICAL basis and, contrarily, “DISCIPLINE” has been obtained according to the METHODOLOGICAL and epistemological basis. In the modern age, “DISCIPLINE” has become the base of education and research due to the domination of the classification resulted from the method and truth criteria. But because of the shortcomings found in these criteria, once again ONTOLOGICAL and moral criteria and consequently interdisciplinary came into consideration. Fluidity in the “method” criterion-as a means of classifying the knowledge-has challenged the current boundaries, and taking into account the usefulness of knowledge for problem solving promises interdisciplinary collaborations in the future. Thus, this research studies this issue.

Cites

References

Cite

APA: Copy

BAHRANI, MORTEZA. (2013). DISCIPLINE, INTERDISCIPLINE AND CLASSIFICATION OF KNOWLEDGE. INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES IN THE HUMANITIES (IRANIAN JOURNAL OF CULTURAL RESEARCH), 5(2 (18)), 37-59. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/152430/en

Vancouver: Copy

BAHRANI MORTEZA. DISCIPLINE, INTERDISCIPLINE AND CLASSIFICATION OF KNOWLEDGE. INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES IN THE HUMANITIES (IRANIAN JOURNAL OF CULTURAL RESEARCH)[Internet]. 2013;5(2 (18)):37-59. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/152430/en

IEEE: Copy

MORTEZA BAHRANI, “DISCIPLINE, INTERDISCIPLINE AND CLASSIFICATION OF KNOWLEDGE,” INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES IN THE HUMANITIES (IRANIAN JOURNAL OF CULTURAL RESEARCH), vol. 5, no. 2 (18), pp. 37–59, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/152430/en

Related Journal Papers