RANKING FIRMS BASED ON THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA VIA MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE TOPSIS TECHNIQUE AND COMPARING EVALUATION CRITERIA (EVIDENCE FROM COMPANIES LISTED IN TEHRAN STOCK EXCHANGE)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

NAMAZI M.; NAMAZI N.R.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Financial Accounting Research Year:2016 | Volume:8 | Issue:2 (28) Page(s): 39-63

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

2,012

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

RANKING FIRMS BASED ON THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA VIA MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE TOPSIS TECHNIQUE AND COMPARING EVALUATION CRITERIA (EVIDENCE FROM COMPANIES LISTED IN TEHRAN STOCK EXCHANGE)

Author(s)

NAMAZI M. | NAMAZI N.R. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONQ2

TRADITIONAL CRITERIAQ2

MODERN CRITERIAQ2

ECONOMIC CRITERIAQ2

RANKINGQ2

TOPSISQ2

Abstract

This research follows two main goals: first, RANKING firms which are listed in Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE) based on the PERFORMANCE EVALUATION criteria and and second, Comparing performance criteria and identifying the best measures to assess performance. In complying with the first aim, traditional financial ratios, modern and economics measures were calculated for the period of 13 years (2000-2013) as PERFORMANCE EVALUATION criteria for the sample firms. Then, selected samples were ranked according of each index via the TOPSIS technique and Shannon’s entropy concept. Moreover, companies were ranked according of total performance indexes. The results showed that when the traditional ratios, modern or economic indexes are used individually, a firm belonging to the sugar industry, metallic mineral mining industry, vehicle and parts manufacturing industry is the first one respectively. However, when total indexes are used, a firm belonging to the vehicle and parts manufacturing industry posits the first rank. In attaining the second aim of the research, hypotheses regarding to the determination of the significance of the differences between relative proximity indexes of the firms in traditional, modern and economics criteria and also, determination of the existence and effect relationship between criteria and determination of the closest index to total indexes, were tested. Thus, Friedman test, Spearman test and regression were performed. Results showed that TOPSIS is an appropriate technique for RANKING of the firm, and there is a significant differences between relative proximity indexes of the traditional, modern and economics criteria. Also, there is a significant relation between the modern and economic ratios, but these indexes do not exhibit a significant relation with the traditional performance criteria. Other results of this research relates to the existence of the relation between modern and economic indexes, compared with the TRADITIONAL CRITERIA, to total indexes.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

NAMAZI, M., & NAMAZI, N.R.. (2016). RANKING FIRMS BASED ON THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA VIA MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE TOPSIS TECHNIQUE AND COMPARING EVALUATION CRITERIA (EVIDENCE FROM COMPANIES LISTED IN TEHRAN STOCK EXCHANGE). JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 8(2 (28) ), 39-63. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/155182/en

Vancouver: Copy

NAMAZI M., NAMAZI N.R.. RANKING FIRMS BASED ON THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA VIA MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE TOPSIS TECHNIQUE AND COMPARING EVALUATION CRITERIA (EVIDENCE FROM COMPANIES LISTED IN TEHRAN STOCK EXCHANGE). JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH[Internet]. 2016;8(2 (28) ):39-63. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/155182/en

IEEE: Copy

M. NAMAZI, and N.R. NAMAZI, “RANKING FIRMS BASED ON THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA VIA MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE TOPSIS TECHNIQUE AND COMPARING EVALUATION CRITERIA (EVIDENCE FROM COMPANIES LISTED IN TEHRAN STOCK EXCHANGE),” JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, vol. 8, no. 2 (28) , pp. 39–63, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/155182/en

Related Journal Papers