COMPARISON OF VIEWS OF ALLAME TABATABAI AND M.ARABI ON VISION AND SEEING

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

RAHIMPUR FORUGH; YAVARI SUDE

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK Year:2010 | Volume:45 | Issue:3-4 Page(s): 65-86

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,568

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF VIEWS OF ALLAME TABATABAI AND M.ARABI ON VISION AND SEEING

Author(s)

RAHIMPUR FORUGH | YAVARI SUDE | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ALLAME M.H.TABATABAIQ2

M.ARABIQ2

SEEING GODQ2

VISIONQ3

HEARTQ2

WISDOMQ2

Abstract

This paper compares VISION, in general, and SEEING GOD, in particular from two viewpoints: ALLAME M.H.TABATABAI’s and M.ARABI’s, who are representatives of two school of Hikmat Mutaalie and Gnosticism. Subjects such as: HEART as the place of receiving VISION, the factors for incerasing HEART’s receiving capability of the inspirations, error in VISIONary knowledge, criteria for finding these errors and SEEING GOD are investigated in this paper. A quick look at these two scholars’ definition of “vision” makes one think that these two views are complementary and point to the same direction.Also there are similarities in their approach to the subject of VISION. For example, both agreed that the HEART is the place to receive the VISION and Aref can increase his HEART’s receiving ability by some self-watching exercises. They both believe that it is possible for VISIONary knowledge to be erroneous for the probability of non-divine sources of revelations or inspirations and wrong interpretations of observations. However, there are important differences between the thinking methods of Allameh and Ibn Arabi, the most crucial of which is the different position of rational mind in their views.As for Allameh, unlike Ibn Arabi, it has a special importance as a cognitive tool and he refers to it as a criterion for the validity of VISIONary knowledge.

Cites

No record.

References

مروری بر دو دیدگاه در مورد ذبیح ابراهیم (ع) در سنت اسلامی

Cite

APA: Copy

RAHIMPUR, FORUGH, & YAVARI, SUDE. (2010). COMPARISON OF VIEWS OF ALLAME TABATABAI AND M.ARABI ON VISION AND SEEING. RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK, 45(3-4), 65-86. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/157402/en

Vancouver: Copy

RAHIMPUR FORUGH, YAVARI SUDE. COMPARISON OF VIEWS OF ALLAME TABATABAI AND M.ARABI ON VISION AND SEEING. RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK[Internet]. 2010;45(3-4):65-86. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/157402/en

IEEE: Copy

FORUGH RAHIMPUR, and SUDE YAVARI, “COMPARISON OF VIEWS OF ALLAME TABATABAI AND M.ARABI ON VISION AND SEEING,” RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK, vol. 45, no. 3-4, pp. 65–86, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/157402/en

Related Journal Papers