The Relationship Between Schematization and Concretization in Ingarden’ s Phenomenological Aesthetics

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Khalilian Mohammad Amin; OLIA MASOUD; Mostafavi Shams Almolouk

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK Year:2020 | Volume:11 | Issue:2 (28) Page(s): 1-12

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

458

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The Relationship Between Schematization and Concretization in Ingarden’ s Phenomenological Aesthetics

Author(s)

Khalilian Mohammad Amin | OLIA MASOUD | Mostafavi Shams Almolouk | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

phenomenological aestheticsQ1

musical workQ1

intentional objectQ1

concretizationQ1

schematizationQ1

points of indeterminacyQ1

incompletenessQ1

Abstract

Roman Ingarden is a crucial figure in phenomenological aesthetics. Generally, his phenomenological studies are in the realm of Aesthetics. He believes that the work of art has a peculiar mode of being. Based on his viewpoint, the work of art is not a wholly determined and autonomous object, and its being depends upon the intentional acts of the creator and the reader. In fact, the work of art is “ an intersubjective intentional object” of which the musical work is one of the best example. This article considers the relation of two fundamentally phenomenological terms: schematization and concretization. Based on these terms and step by step, we show that the work of art as an intentional object has schematic and incomplete structure and by its concretizations changes into aesthetic object. A Work of art is not a closed cognitive structure manifested by the reader. It is an “ open entity” the meaning of which arises from its concretizations. Thus, a work of art is an eternally alive and novel entity.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Khalilian, Mohammad Amin, OLIA, MASOUD, & Mostafavi, Shams Almolouk. (2020). The Relationship Between Schematization and Concretization in Ingarden’ s Phenomenological Aesthetics. RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK, 11(2 (28) ), 1-12. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/157452/en

Vancouver: Copy

Khalilian Mohammad Amin, OLIA MASOUD, Mostafavi Shams Almolouk. The Relationship Between Schematization and Concretization in Ingarden’ s Phenomenological Aesthetics. RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK[Internet]. 2020;11(2 (28) ):1-12. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/157452/en

IEEE: Copy

Mohammad Amin Khalilian, MASOUD OLIA, and Shams Almolouk Mostafavi, “The Relationship Between Schematization and Concretization in Ingarden’ s Phenomenological Aesthetics,” RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK, vol. 11, no. 2 (28) , pp. 1–12, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/157452/en

Related Journal Papers