AN ANALYSIS OF THE CRITIQUE OF KANT’S “CATEGORICAL”

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AZHDAR ALIREZA; ZAMANI MEHDI; ALAMALHODA ALI; PANAHI AKBAR

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK Year:2012 | Volume:48 | Issue:13 Page(s): 79-94

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

3,170

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

AN ANALYSIS OF THE CRITIQUE OF KANT’S “CATEGORICAL”

Author(s)

AZHDAR ALIREZA | ZAMANI MEHDI | ALAMALHODA ALI | PANAHI AKBAR | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CATEGORICALQ3

OBLIGATIONISMQ2

ISLAMIC ETHICSQ2

NORMAL ETHICSQ2

KANTQ2

Abstract

As a Golden Law, KANT’s “CATEGORICAL” is a concept which is rooted in the history of human thought. This principle which has the most important role in regulating the social relations in the world’s nations and its traces can be found in all religious and humane schools and branches, is stated and explained by KANT in a short sentence:“Always follow a rule that you will it to be a general law”.This rule underpins an important ethical school which is known as “Obligationism”. Although this school has attracted many scholars of ethics philosophy, there are also many critiques against it. This article aims to study and analyze “the critique of maximal CATEGORICAL” in such school with regard to ISLAMIC ETHICS in order to show that the attempts of those who have tried to prove the compatibility of this rule with ISLAMIC ETHICS are in vain and lead to no result.

Cites

No record.

References

دو حکم جزمی تجربه گرایی

Cite

APA: Copy

AZHDAR, ALIREZA, ZAMANI, MEHDI, ALAMALHODA, ALI, & PANAHI, AKBAR. (2012). AN ANALYSIS OF THE CRITIQUE OF KANT’S “CATEGORICAL”. RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK, 48(13), 79-94. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/157480/en

Vancouver: Copy

AZHDAR ALIREZA, ZAMANI MEHDI, ALAMALHODA ALI, PANAHI AKBAR. AN ANALYSIS OF THE CRITIQUE OF KANT’S “CATEGORICAL”. RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK[Internet]. 2012;48(13):79-94. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/157480/en

IEEE: Copy

ALIREZA AZHDAR, MEHDI ZAMANI, ALI ALAMALHODA, and AKBAR PANAHI, “AN ANALYSIS OF THE CRITIQUE OF KANT’S “CATEGORICAL”,” RESEARCH ON METAPHYSIK, vol. 48, no. 13, pp. 79–94, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/157480/en

Related Journal Papers